Is That a Fact?

How many facts can you leave out before it’s a falsehood

September 27th, 2006 – 10:16 PM by Eric Black

The latest episode of the hit series “Is That a Fact?” dings Patty Wetterling pretty hard for an ad in which, as the story says, omits a fact so relevant that it crosses the line into falsehood.

The Wetterling ad in question, titled “More,” has a major problem and a minor problem, and I regret that I may be be somewhat to blame for the lesser one.

Interestingly, for those, like myself , who are using the “Is That a Fact” project to try to catalogue the different ways that political communications can stray from the staright and narrow, the smaller deception is the half-truth, while the bigger one is the deception by omission.

Here’s the deal

Wetterling’s ad asserts that Bachmann, contrary to being a tax-cutter, actually supports a 23 percent federal sales tax on everything you buy! If true, that would be a pretty big deal!

The reference is to a plan, called “The Fair Tax” by its advocates (although I don’t where it has much to do with tax fairness, but a lot to do with tax simplification) would indeed impose a 23 national sales tax on everything you buy, even up to cars and houses.

Problem 1 (the smaller one): Bachmann hasn’t clearly embraced the Fair Tax. You can get a taste of the back and forth on that from the story itself, if you don’t mind, or you can read the endless boring passage below headlined “please stop reading here”.)

Problem 2 (the bigger one) is that the Fair Tax plan is supposed to be “revenue neutral,” meaning the federal treasury breaks even on the deal, because in exchange for the 23 percent sales tax it repeals all federal income and payroll taxes. That’s a pretty big tradeoff.

But the Wetterling ad didn’t mention the repeal of income and payroll taxes.

You can argue about whether a 23 percent sales tax would really replace all the revenue collected from federal income and payroll taxes, and you can argue that the Fair Tax would make the tax system more regressive, but you can’t honestly argue (as the Wetterling ad does) that it’s an overall tax increase and you can’t discuss it honestly until you acknowledge that in exchange for paying the new sales tax, you get out from under income and payroll taxes.

Wetterling declined to be interviewed about the problems with the ad. Her campaign manager, the helpful and friendly Corey Day, couldn’t come up with much of a defense for leaving that little fact out of the ad. He said it was included in the press release announcing the ad and in the factual backup on the Wetterling website. Which it was. And if you believe that as many people are going to read the website as are going to see the ad, that would be a pretty good excuse.

Please stop reading here…

because the next section is a little uncomfortable and embarrasing for your obedient blogger.

Bachmann’s official position on the Fair Tax idea is that it’s “worthy of debate.” Considering that the idea has ben before Congress since 1999, and she’s presenting herself as a tax expert, and she has said that the federal tax system is “totally broken” and “in need of a complete overhaul,” one could fairly ask her when she will be ready to clearly come out for or against it. But “worthy of debate” by itself does not mean she’s for it.

Among the bits of evidence adduced by Team Wetterling to prove that Bachmann favors the Fair Tax was Feb. 21 piece by yours truly, containing short summaries of all the Sixth District candidates, Republican and DFL, back when there were six such candidates. In describing some of Bachmann’s positions, I wrote: “Would replace income tax with national consumption tax.” (That’s not a quote from Bachmann, but a paraphrase from me.) My recollection is that Bachmann spoke so enthusiastically about the idea, that I believed she had embraced it. But she called to say that I had overstated the case and had only committed herself to consider the idea.

Two days later, I wrote about it again and said he position was that Bachmann ” would consider the elimination of federal income taxes, to be replaced by a national consumption tax.”

In the backup for the ad, Wetterling cited both pieces. If my reporting contributed to an honest misunderstanding of Bachmann’s position, I apologize. But as recently as last week, in debates, Bachmann spoke about the Fair Tax idea, cautiously gave some of the pros and cons, and said she considered it an idea worth debating.

p.s. Yes, I’m aware that the NRCC is now running a TV spot that repeats the inaccurate characterization of Wetterling’s position on the Bush tax cuts. She favors allowing them to expire only for the highest-income one percent. The NRCC ad is based on the premise that she favors allowing them to expire entirely.

I addressed this matter in a recent “Is That a Fact?” both in the Biq Q and in the paper. Then, the NRCC was doing it in a flyer. Now it’s a TV spot.

Bachmann continues to decline all opportunities to comment on the deceptive NRCC communications.

192 Responses to "

Is That a Fact?

How many facts can you leave out before it’s a falsehood"

Michael Blaine says:

September 27th, 2006 at 10:23 pm

“[Wetterling] favors allowing [the Bush tax cuts] to expire [in 2010] only for the highest-income one percent.”

That is sound policy that will bring the US back from the brink of fiscal disaster. I hope the entire Democratic party adopts it as overall policy.

Mark says:

September 27th, 2006 at 10:32 pm

And your eveidence of “fiscal disaster” is?

Bachmann vs. Wetterling » Blog Archive » Eric Black takes a critical look at the Wetterling tax ad says:

September 27th, 2006 at 10:39 pm

[…] ad any supporting material not included in the ad. Note: Black expands on the article with a post on the matter at his Big Question blog. It’s entitled How many f […]

Bill Prendergast says:

September 27th, 2006 at 11:53 pm

Eric Black: “you can’t honestly argue (as the Wetterling ad does) that it’s an overall tax increase”

You know, Mr. Black–I just looked at the script for that Wetterling ad you’re claiming is misleading, and I just can’t seem to find the phrase “it’s an overall tax increase” in there anywhere. I’m in my late forties and my eyes are weaker, but I just can’t seem to find those words or that argument you attribute in the ad you’re criticizing. I can’t even find those three little words in the ad–”overall tax increase.”

Here’s what the Wetterling ad *does* say:
“Politician Michele Bachmann claims she’s for lower taxes.
But she supports a new national sales tax that would cost us more.
23% more at the pump…23% more for groceries and clothing…23% when you buy a new car, or even a new home.
Michele Bachmann…radical ideas we can’t afford.”

I think that argument is relatively easily to follow: 23% more at the pump…23% more for groceries and clothing…23% for a new car, or a new home, would “cost us more.” That’s true, paying 23% more in taxes for a car would “cost us more.” That’s all the ad claims, the Wetterlin ad doesn’t claim that “it’s an overall tax increase” despite your criticism of it.

It’s just a claim that if Bachmann had her way, taxes on gas, groceries, clothing, cars and new homes would jump 23%.

But does Bachmann really support that kind of taxation on American consumers?

As you note, you’re a key source for the notion that Bachmann supported a national consumption tax on consumers. It’s hardly fair for you to say that the Wetterling campaign is at fault for relying on your reporting–especially when you stood by your original appraisal of Bachmann’s position (in print) after she tried to correct you, especially since you’re not retracting those stories now.

The easiest way to settle it:
when your reporting of Bachmann’s position on a consumption tax appeared, did she ask for a retraction, to set the record straight? If she didn’t, if she saw that attributed to her in “Candidate Positions”–she’s stuck with that position until she renounces it publicly, and it’s fair for the Wetterling campaign to attribute that position to her.

For Bachmann to say that the consumption tax idea “is worthy of debate” is not asking for a retraction, it’s not a public renunciation of the policy. It’s nowhere near a denial. It’s trying to have it both ways, making a non-committal statement about the consumption tax.

If she’s not willing to make her current position on these tax hikes clear, it’s fair for the Wetterling campaign to rely on your earlier reporting–if she never demanded a retraction, and you never printed one. It’s her duty to make her position on the issue clear–publicly, not over the phone.

Mark says:

September 28th, 2006 at 12:01 am

But the fact is that if you would do any research into the “Fair Tax Plan” that this plan proposes consumption tax REBATES that would reduce or eliminate any sales taxes paid by lower income people. THese rebates would be based on the household incomes.

Again, before you jump to conclusions make sure you understand what is actually being proposed.

Mark says:

September 28th, 2006 at 12:08 am

The World Economic Forum issues a “ranking”. It is meaningless. And, comparing national debts, Sweden has a national debt of 50.4% of GDP. The United States has a national debt of 37.4%.

Paul S. says:

September 28th, 2006 at 12:24 am

Bill P. - I saw the ad before Eric wrote about it here, and I think it’s pretty obviously intended to convey an impression that we’re talking about about an overall tax increase, with a little deniability built in. I’m also pretty sure that any Republican ad that engaged in the same convenient vagueness would be met with loud declarations of Rovian darkness.

Mark says:

September 28th, 2006 at 12:29 am

Again, the “Fair Tax Plan” is designed to be revenue and distribution neutral. It is simply to shift taxes from income to consumption.

IF you are not paying any federal taxes now you will not be paying federal taxes with this plan.

I personally support the concept but find it unrealistic because of the “rebates”. I do not think that a realistic system could be worked out.

The benefits of the plan are that the taxes are immediately collected and the $10.7 billion annual budget item called the Internal Revenue Service will be eliminated.

Howard Miller says:

September 28th, 2006 at 12:50 am

haven’t seen the Wetterling campaign ad, but, assuming the summary here was accurate, it sure sounds like it is utterly misleading

if candidate Wetterling wants to win, she should focus on candidate Bachmann’s real weaknesses …. not use some misleading spin on a tax plan that will never happen in any event

Bill Prendergast says:

September 28th, 2006 at 12:56 am

Fellas,

My comments don’t go to the merits or the undesirability of the consumption tax. They’re just comments about whether the Wetterling ad could be called “deceptive” or not, and about how Bachmann still won’t make her position clear on the idea. I think it’s fair to hold her to the pro-consumption tax position reported by the Star Tribune until she officially demands a public retraction or clarification.

Paul S.–I can’t argue you out of the impression you get from the ad; all I can do is remind you that that’s not what the ad says–it doesn’t “say” that Bachmann’s proposed 23% tax hikes on homes, cars, etc. would be an “overall tax increase.” How can we fairly hold someone responsible for a statement they *didn’t* make?

There’s nothing vague about the ad. It makes specific claims. The most you can fairly infer from the text of the script is that Bachmann has no problem with raising taxes on consumers by 23%–inferring more than that isn’t justified, on the basis of what the ad actually says. If you want to infer more than the ad actually says, no one can stop you, but that’s not the fault of the people who made the ad.

And if Bachmann wants to argue that her position on this issue wouldn’t constitute an overall tax increase–you go, girl! Explain that to the middle class and the working poor.

The problem is that she seems to be backing away from this issue, now that election time’s approaching. Maybe this ad will force her to take a clear public stand on an issue that’s she’s been talking about for months now.

She should take this golden opportunity to either renounce the consumption tax publicly, or explain to the voters how it would work and why it’s such a great idea. Saying it’s “worthy of debate” is just blather. Which side of the debate would will you take, Michele?

Mark says:

September 28th, 2006 at 12:59 am

Whatever. This is just typical political BS. I am sure that you would not be calling on Patty Wetterling to make such declarations.

The Fair Tax plan is never going to become a real issue.

Chip says:

September 28th, 2006 at 4:52 am

Moving to a national sales tax WOULD be a tax increase on the lower and middle class. It’s very regressive. And since people care about the taxes “they” pay, and not the overall amount collected, I would argue that the ad is correct there.

Unfortunate that Bachmann’s support of it has varied in different venues. No more of a distortion than what’s been done to Wetterling over and over, but unfortunate regardless.

If the people of Central MN pick Bachmann over Wetterling it will be an embarassment for the whole state.

Eric Zaetsch says:

September 28th, 2006 at 8:04 am

The problem is the GOP. They have always been the problem.

They, Bachmann included, always say they are going to cut taxes, or hold the line on taxes. Then the wealthy are served, as sensible people knew and expected all along.

The Bachmann website takes no real position except she is on record for wanting to make it easier for businesses to operate, including opposition to a lifting of the freeze on the minimum wage - has it been frozen for a decade, it seems so?

The disruptive impact of a national or federal sales tax on poor people [who insist on calling themselves “middle class” but in too many instances live paycheck to paycheck, overuse credit cards, etc.] who have to sell their time/labor to live; vs the wealthy who live off the earnings of their capital holdings, and are idle pursuing leisure; or driven anyway like Gates and Buffet.

Done as a tax inposed at the time of any purchase - not merely consumer purchases - it would affect capital intensive industry more; hence a cry would arise to amortize the effect or not even impose it. And would private sector builders pay a tax on concrete and rebar, but public highway projects not be taxed?

Consider auto assembly. Buy parts, pay a consumption tax there, sell an auto through channels and tax each change of title so that the plant holds ownership until the end=user consumer buys to dodge intermediary taxation - dealers become commission agents as their current employees are, etc.

Clearly, the rational capitalist need not be smart, only rational, to figure out the deal is, assemble overseas, so that under free trade agreements, the finished item, title held overseas, dodges the tax on sale of parts.

Net effect - far, far greater job outsourcing than now; without tinkering and creating business “exceptions.”

Then, bond clippers - they are consuming the time value of money, are they not, so that their consumption should be taxed, identical rate as a loaf of bread or a Starbucks latte.

Can you hear the GOP regulars howling like full-moon wolves on that proposal? Somehow, Mark will explain that such a possibility is unfair, and a burden on proper economic functioning of free market mechanisms.

But it is the proper way to view things.

And employers, they consume the labor and time of employees, so tax that consumption, yes/no? All we have is time, really, until the reaper reaps. And we sell it in drips and drabs.

The devil [or Antichrist?] is in the details of how the GOP would talk the talk, and then walk their true walk where the wealthy get off far better and stand on the backs of others, yet again, still.

It would screw everybody else far more than the current system does, and the super-rich would laugh and laugh at the gullibility of those voting Bachmann because they feel somehow threatened every time somebody says, “Look, those two women want to marry. The sky is falling, falling.” Save me and the nation, please, from falseness and great abiding stupidity, please.

And tax the rich for a change. What about an annual wealth tax? Now there’s an idea to explore, but it is not going to happen to be a hot topic in MN 6, is it?

Finally, there was a Nov. 15, 2005, GOP candidates forum that Taxpayer League and others coordinated, that supposedly has Krinkie, Bachmann, Knoblach, and Esmay on audio record yammering vaguely about such a tax scheme:

http://insideminnesotapolitics.blogspot.com/2005/11/6th-district-republicans-forum-how-far.html

If you have the stomach to listen to that batch, I don’t, go for it and see what Bachmann actually then said. On the web, she is quoted:

Michele Bachmann: “…we are now at a time where we are, very realistically, looking at a consumption tax vs. an income tax. And the whole difference behind this is that people would really feel the burden of the tax increases, and they would choose how they want to proceed.”

http://minnpolitics.blogspot.com/2006/01/sixth-congressional-district.html#c113808321001230484

That sure sounds pro-consumption tax to me - suggesting it would be an incentive for families to save and consume less; thus walking into the fallacy of composition - what might be good for a household - substantially greater saving = coulc imperil and unbalance the economy, if done catastrophically, in aggregate. It would be like the 1986 tax “reform” act making some then current practices of savings-and-loan operations less beneficial with tax incentives removed - aka the “Savings and Loan Crisks.”

Those advocating hanging more of a burden on the poor, should remember the disruptive way the effects of that little game played out.

Finally, how can you call yourself pro-family, and support such a measure? It weighs heavily on larger families, who with more mouths to feed and bodies to clothe, would pay higher taxes than single people earning identical amounts. Especially families with two working spouses, having twice the commuting expense and business attire and other work costs as a single person. And the single person buying and selling stocks via offshore accounts, there’s where the smart money would gravitate; causing complications, adjustments, and lots of grumbling.

Bottom line - income taxation and estate taxation is not broke, so don’t throw it out. So, keep it and tune it to be fairer to those with less prosperity.

Eric Zaetsch says:

September 28th, 2006 at 8:19 am

Aside from the merits of the proposal, Bill Prendergast is 100% dead-on correct about the situation in MN 6.

If Bachmann was her dilatory self and did not press for an immediate and unequivocal correction she had constructive if not actual notice of what major media outlets were publishing about her, as a candidate for major public office, and hence a duty to speak or live with the characterizations exactly as published if she remained silent.

Her silence embraced the reporting as correct.

And it is nothing but super-giant IHOP waffle scale, to say “worthy of consideration” or some such drivel, instead of having the backbone to take a decisive and clear position without waffling.

Dora says:

September 28th, 2006 at 8:25 am

“super-giant IHOP waffle scale”. I love the visual on that Eric Z. I can see the commercial now. Show a picture of her face, cut to quotes on how she’s backed away, last frame is a big giant waffle. No need for words. Heh.

Sean says:

September 28th, 2006 at 8:28 am

Calling it a 23% tax is misleading as well. The way the “Fair Tax” folks calculate it, it’s a $23 tax on a $77 item — so the tax is 23% of the total. To most people, this would actually be a 30% tax. It should also be pointed out that the GAO studied the Fair Tax and concluded that to be truly revenue-neutral, it would have to be a 36% tax. Not to mention the less than glowing reviews the Fair Tax got from President Bush’s Tax Reform Commission.

Eric Zaetsch says:

September 28th, 2006 at 8:39 am

Let’s get down to basics.

It is not for Patty Wetterling to explain ins and outs of Michele Bachmann’s positions, it is for Bachmann to do so.

Bachmann is deliberately vague.

If she cares little to define herself; which she can do in the upcoming level-playing=field League of Women Voters debate; then fine - lady, please do it.

We prefer you to NOT duck issues.

But Patty Wetterling cannot read the blank slate of Michele Bachmann’s mind, when Bachmann herself does not publicly disclose where she stands and what she really thinks.

John Binkowski cannnot do that, Marcus Bachmann cannot do that. Only Michele Bachmann can define the positions, in detail, that Michele Bachmann takes on issues. We await that.

And not after the fact, “Oh, I did not mean that,” but show some backbone by taking a position. Why not?

Sean says:

September 28th, 2006 at 8:50 am

It should also be pointed out that the IRS wouldn’t go away completely under the “Fair Tax”. Somebody has to monitor whether or not folks are complying with the law. Maybe it won’t be called the IRS, but there still will be a need for some sort of tax compliance organization.

Eric Zaetsch says:

September 28th, 2006 at 8:59 am

Sean - And there will be paperwork, at all levels, and complications and legislators wanting to tinker with incentives for this and that - credits and deductions and amortizations. The basic human animal will not change, regardless of how you try to tax it.

John Nothdurft says:

September 28th, 2006 at 9:12 am

Some of the people on here need to read the New York Time’s best seller by Neal Boortz and Congressman John Linder called “The FairTax Book.” The assumption that the FairTax is regressive is not true. Boston University Economist and life long Democrat Larry Kotlikoff who has been been a part of much of the $22 million research project on creating the FairTax.

This is a PROGRESSIVE National Sales Tax. The FairTax is the only tax reform proposal which “untaxes” the poor (no income tax, no Social Security taxes, no hidden taxes, no tax on used goods, no tax on necessities), and allows wage earners to keep 100 percent of their paycheck, while still funding all existing federal government programs.

The FairTax combines a national retail sales tax on new goods and services with a universal “prebate” provided to ALL legal citizens to offset the sales tax paid on expenditures up to the poverty level. For a family of four this equals $26,400 worth of federal tax-free spending per year before even paying the FairTax from their own income.

Oh and by the way this is a REAL issue, thats why FairTax.org is the largest tax reform group in the nation with over 800,000 supporters and the most widely supported tax reform bill in front of Congress, with 10 times more co-sponsors than the flat tax ever had. Go to FairTax.org or read the book and get your facts straight before start making assumptions.

bsimon says:

September 28th, 2006 at 9:17 am

Given that Bachmann does have some radical, bizarre ideas, it seems a poor course of action to run an ad that misrepresents her position on an issue that is legitimately open for debate. I hope that Ms. Wetterling is not arguing that the current tax system is not broken…

JohnMelin says:

September 28th, 2006 at 9:27 am

Here is the story in the StarTribune:

Patty, Michelle, Patty, Mickelle, Patty, Michelle, Patty, Michelle, Patty, Michelle, Patty, Michelle, Patty Michelle, patty, Michelle, patty Michelle, John Binkowski.

A little truth on the truth telling. John Binkowski solely introduced the flat tax to the debate, Bachman referenced it. John talked about it in his party’s platform, Bachman made one tiny comment. The StarTribune was 90 degrees off on the real story- hmmmm

Michelle, Patty, Michelle, Patty, Michelle, Patty… hmmmm….

bottomfeeder says:

September 28th, 2006 at 9:42 am

Looks like the Wetterling campaign is starting to play hardball and some don’t like it….. I wonder where they got this attack plan from? A little omission here, a little falsehood there…

Sean says:

September 28th, 2006 at 9:53 am

Re: the “prebate”

What you are then creating is the largest entitlement program in U.S. government history. Many families would be reliant on the prebate to cover their month to month expenses. Is that really what you’re trying to accomplish?

L David says:

September 28th, 2006 at 10:44 am

It’s sad that politics in general is about half-truths and deception.

Paul S. says:

September 28th, 2006 at 11:01 am

bottomfeeder -

That’s the last line of defense: “Okay, it’s deceptive. But can you blame us, given what we’ve had to put up with? In fact we’re to be congratulated for finally doing politics like this!” Yuck.

Chip, Bill and others -

First of all, again: look honestly at yourself and see what your reaction would be if the Republicans had a similarly misleading ad, and tried to deny it by saying “oh, but that’s not exactly what we said.” Come on.

And even more importantly, reading John Northdurft’s entry prods me to say something I thought of earlier: I really doubt any of you or Patty Wetterling have *thoroughly* looked into this idea in all its permutations and only then decided it’s a bad one. In order to defend her, I suspect you’re just latching on to the readiest arguments that it’s a bad idea.

I’ve always thought this idea might be worth debating; the fact that Bachmann says it’s worth debating seems ike a perfectly reasonable thing to say, given that it’s not at the center of her political universe, and doesn’t add to the list of reasons I suspect she’s a loony.

So what Wetterling’s ad does, aside from the impact on the campaign, is help form one more half-assed assumption in the paranoid left-minded that something is bad and secretly sinister, when it really may not be and may in fact be good.

bsimon: Yes.

Mike says:

September 28th, 2006 at 11:04 am

I have to echo what John Merlin said on the subject. We can try to figure out what candidates in this race think, or we can actually report what candidates come out and openly say.

One thing worth noting, Patty Wetterling either has no clue what the fair tax proposal is, or likes to misrepresent the views of her opponents. Either way Patty is clasless in her attacks of Binkowski’s preposal.

Paul S. says:

September 28th, 2006 at 11:06 am

Sean -

A larger entitlement program than the mortgage interest write-off and Social Security? Maybe, but wow. And larger than the annual tax refunds most lower-to-middle income people receive, and which they also depend on to some extent?

Mark says:

September 28th, 2006 at 11:26 am

IF you want to debate the particulars of the Fair Tax plan then you must do it with the correct information.

John N. is correct that the Fair Tax is progressive. The 23% number is not a number picked out of the hat. It is the average tax rate that is paid by the highest income earning groups. People earning less than the top 1% would see rebates of their sales tax expenditures that would drive their actual taxes to the level they pay now.

The “prebate” is not an entitlement program. It is equivalent to getting your tax refund because you withheld too much money.

I believe the theory of moving taxation from income to consumption is a good one. However, I do think that this rebate idea is a non-workable concept.

Further, it prevents tax cheating. If you are taking allot of your money offshore and avoiding paying income taxes by whatever loophole you will pay taxes as long as you spend money in the United States. Drug dealers and prostitutes will pay the Fair Tax. Business cheats will also pay.

Attack ads like this are effective in that you associate your opponent with a policy they may not even support, and then distort that policy. In this case I think it is not that effective because the audience of people who are against tax increases are already solidly in Michelle’s camp and will not be deceived by this.

Wetterling needs to hit the blue collar social conservative (pro-life anti-gay) with some similar attack ad that can change their minds.

John Krogstad says:

September 28th, 2006 at 11:28 am

There are lies by commission and lies by ommission. Whenever an ommission or a distortion of the truth is employed, a falsehood is created with malice aforethought.

Bill Prendergast says:

September 28th, 2006 at 11:35 am

John Melin says:
“John Binkowski solely introduced the flat tax to the debate, Bachman referenced it. John talked about it in his party’s platform, Bachman made one tiny comment.”

I don’t understand you, John Melin. Bachmann’s been talking about the flat tax for months. What do you mean that she made one tiny comment about it? If you mean that she made “one tiny comment” in one particular debate, that may be true. If you mean that she made “one tiny comment” about the consumption tax during this election cycle–that’s wrong. She’s been talking a lot about the consumption tax and how it would work for a looong time now.

That’s why Eric Black printed that she was for it–she was explaining the hell out of how it worked, publicly:

“It’s important that people understand that if we have the fair tax, on every purchase that you make, including purchase of a home, food, every purchase that you make, you’d be making an increase of 23 cents on the dollar, that’s what your tax would be.”–Michele Bachmann

She let the “Bachmann is pro-consumption tax” statement go out twice, in a major paper, without asking for a correction or retraction.

What’s unclear is how she feels about it NOW. That’s unclear because she refuses to take a public position on it anymore–just doesn’t want to talk about it. That’s why her remarks on the subject are getting “tiny.”

So she is stuck with last public positions she took on it, months ago, until she makes her position on it clear. And that means the Wetterling charges are right–as of the date of those ads, Michele want working people to pay 23% more for a new car, 23% more for a new home, etc.

You see, you gotta understand, Bachmann. Bachmann is an extremist nut who does not feel bound by any code of personal ethics or responsibility. Bachmann thinks: whatever is to my personal advantage, is right, is “of the Lord.” She’s perfectly willing to distort her own record to gain a politcal advantage–or lie to her supporters to gain any kind of political advantage. Witness:

Bachmann in 2004, telling a radio audience what would happen if her same-sex marriage ban amendment failed to pass in 2004: “…Our K-12 public school system, of which ninety per cent of all youth are in the public school system, they will be required to learn that homosexuality is normal, equal and perhaps you should try it. And that will occur immediately, that all schools will begin teaching homosexuality.” –Senator Michele Bachmann, appearing as guest on radio program “Prophetic Views Behind The News”, hosted by Jan Markell, KKMS 980-AM, March 6, 2004.

Mark says:

September 28th, 2006 at 12:01 pm

““…Our K-12 public school system, of which ninety per cent of all youth are in the public school system, they will be required to learn that homosexuality is normal, equal and perhaps you should try it. And that will occur immediately, that all schools will begin teaching homosexuality.”

Do you think that is nuts? If you do you are being ridiculous. I would guess that 60% of the people in the 6th District would agree with that statement and many more sympathize.

Even people who are “tolerant” of homosexuality are very uncomforatble with the concept of it being a subject in schools. “Timmy has two dads” is not something most people want the schools delving into.

Children will see this in real life and then their parents can explain it to them in the manner they think best. Many people across the nation are very upset at the way that public schools handle sexuality. And they have the right to be upset.

Dirtyspeed says:

September 28th, 2006 at 12:04 pm

Sounds like Wetterling is letting Bachman control the debate. I thought this was supposed to be the battle of who has the best family values. Knowing that Bachman would have to work harder at that she fliped the subject to taxes, and now Wetterling is in the corner.

I like the idea of the fair tax, let the materialistic consumers pay for our war. But Bachman is a theocrat who would stop at nothing to control what you do in your own home and to your body so I guess Im stuck with my income tax, oh well.

Les says:

September 28th, 2006 at 12:04 pm

You know, when the Republican ad failed to mention the fact that the votes Wetterling missed were primary and not general election votes, it was all a big bad republican plot—

But now, when the Wetterling ad fails to include all the facts, it’s the republican’s fault for not clarifying things…..

I had a flat tire last week, was that the republicans fault too???

Hey Bill, we get the picture, you dont like Bachman, OK?

Mark says:

September 28th, 2006 at 12:04 pm

“Wetterling needs to hit the blue collar social conservative (pro-life anti-gay) with some similar attack ad that can change their minds. ”

Like I said before, negative ads are important. This is an efective technique but in this case it is targeted at the wrong audience.

The way you attack Bachman with these ads is to find some sort of transgression she may have committed. Call it the Dr. Laura Method. Find nude pictures of her. That will drive a wedge between her social conservative supporters that are more blue collar Democrats on econimic issues.

bsimon says:

September 28th, 2006 at 12:11 pm

“perhaps you should try it?” Gimme a break. “Teaching homosexuality?” Give me another break. What a bunch of fearmongering hyperbole. This is the kind of nuttiness for which Ms. Bachmann is known.

If Wetterling wants to take on a social issue, maybe abortion wouldn’t be a bad one. Yes, the 6th is notably pro-life. But I wonder how many support a complete & outright ban, even in cases of rape & incest? That is a pretty extreme position & not even ‘conservative.’ Conservative is keeping things the way they are. Rolling back a law thats been in affect for 30 years is regressive. Imposing your beliefs on others is repressive & a government intrusion into people’s lives. Wetterling needs to tie Bachmann to her over-the-top, extreme, radical opinions.

Randy says:

September 28th, 2006 at 12:13 pm

Yes, Senator Bachmann is nuts. Why does not outlawing gay marriage equal compulsory indoctrination? The quote has her saying that schools will be teaching about, and even encouraging, homosexuality if her amendment is defeated. That is nothing more than a scare tactic, and a disingenuous manipulation of facts.

BYW, I have two kids in public schools. Neither has been told that homosexulaity is normal, equal, and perhaps they should try it.

Dora says:

September 28th, 2006 at 12:15 pm

Good lord Mark. I know you said you like negative campaigning but “find nude pictures of her?” What an asinine statement.

Bill Prendergast says:

September 28th, 2006 at 12:25 pm

Maybe this will help you, Mark.

My point–Bachmann is an irresponsible nut who will distort and lie to achieve short term political gain.

In the statement I quote, Bachmann tells the public

1) that her “”ban on gay marriage amendment referendum” may fail to pass in 2004.

2) that if her “ban on gay marriage amendment referendum” fails to pass in 2004, Minnesota public schools will “immediately” “begin teaching homosexuality” to our children.

So what actually DID happened in 2004, after she made these claims?

Well, 1)she didn’t get her referendum or gay marriage ban amendment in 2004.

So “THE BIG QUESTION”, then is: did the public schools “immediately” “begin teaching homosexuality” to kids in public schools, as Bachmann promised would happen?

Well, I don’t know, let’s see. How many of you have third-graders who come home from school these year and say “Guess what I learned today, daddy? Sodomy!”

Is there a lot of that kind of thing going around the school curriculum these days? Or is Michele Bachmann a lying, irresponsible, hate-mongering, panic-mongering nut?

Her panicked prediction did not come true, did it? It was a ridiculous, unjustified warning when she made it, wasn’t it? What kind of a politician would make a panic-mongering, baseless warning like that to stir up homophobia in the audience? I’ll give you a clue, Mark–macadamia, filbert, cashew…

And what has this got to do with the Wetterling ad about the consumption tax? Right now Bachmann and her campaign staff are scrambling, trying to figure out what to say in response to the claim that she supports a consumption tax. Bachmann’s history of amoral lying to the public indicates that the position she finally adopts on the consumption tax will based on one factor and one factor only: what is to my political advantage, this week?

As to whether her previous enthusiasm for the tax was real–if you are a sincere supporter of the fair tax, you better hope that Bachmann’s enthusiasm for the tax is NOT real.

Why? Because she’s a NUT. And if you have a daring new policy initiative that would radically change the basis of taxation in the USA, and you look around the room and see that one of the people who enthusiastically agrees with you is wearing a strait-jacket and a little Napoleon hat–you will have to go back and rethink that policy from the beginning, from the very beginning, to see what it is about the policy that would appeal to a NUT like that.

Les says:

September 28th, 2006 at 12:50 pm

Bill;

That guy wearing the Napolean hat,, What was his name, and when did he agree with Bachman?

Your rhetoric is getting a far out of hand as the candidate have.

Mark says:

September 28th, 2006 at 12:51 pm

“Bachmann is an irresponsible nut who will distort and lie to achieve short term political gain.”

Kind of like what Patty Wetterling has done in the case before the bar. If everyone who has not distorted and lied for short term political gain was forced to leave office, drummed out with a placard saying “Nut” around their body, the entire government body of the United States of America would be on the move.

“And if you have a daring new policy initiative that would radically change the basis of taxation in the USA, and you look around the room and see that one of the people who enthusiastically agrees with you is wearing a strait-jacket and a little Napoleon hat–you will have to go back and rethink that policy from the beginning, from the very beginning, to see what it is about the policy that would appeal to a NUT like that.”

That is just assinine commentary. The Fair Tax plan is a solid idea. Because it is trying to create a “progressive” consumption tax it has some mechanical difficulties. However, the idea behind consumption taxes are very well founded.

“Is there a lot of that kind of thing going around the school curriculum these days? Or is Michele Bachmann a lying, irresponsible, hate-mongering, panic-mongering nut?”

Many people think that there is a lot of that kind of thing going around the school curriculum these days. Are they right…..this is a matter of opinion. Your level of comfort with these issues and how they are handled in schools may be much different than others. That is your right. But they have the same right to express their views.

Further, my tolerance level for such things may be higher than most, but even I believe that in many cases they have a point. The slipshod way the schools handle many sensitive issues creates high levels of bitterness.

It is very clear that schools have decided that one of their proper functions is social engineering. They preach a very politically correct world view that steps into areas that I think are none of the schools business.

Further, I believe that they conduct this social engineering function to the deteriment of their primary purpose: educating children.

Public schools are not a place to free the child’s mind because that mind has not been developed to a point it can be free.

” know you said you like negative campaigning but “find nude pictures of her?” What an asinine statement. ”

Well, only a ass would take it literally. The way to beat a conservative in a conservative district is to either run a social conservative who agrees with the conservative on all/most social issues or to find some wedge issue that can reduce their support amongst this group.

The way to not beat a conservative in a conservative district is to run a liberal who runs on liberal policy and tries to portray the conservative as a nut.

bsimon says:

September 28th, 2006 at 1:25 pm

Mark says “Kind of like what Patty Wetterling has done in the case before the bar. If everyone who has not distorted and lied for short term political gain was forced to leave office, drummed out with a placard saying “Nut” around their body, the entire government body of the United States of America would be on the move.”

What a strawman argument. Bachmann (or Wetterling, for that matter) being a nut has nothing to do with lying and distorting. The rest of your claim is accurate, however.

bsimon says:

September 28th, 2006 at 1:28 pm

Mark returns to lucidity with this one however: “The way to not beat a conservative in a conservative district is to run a liberal who runs on liberal policy and tries to portray the conservative as a nut. ”

If the liberal wants to win that race, they have to portray themselves as a moderate, and expose the nut’s views for how truly radical and extreme they are. So far, this has not happened. Patty Wetterling is running her campaign as though its against Mark Kennedy. If she continues that strategy, she will lose. If she can wake up the electorate to how extreme some of Bachmann’s views are, she has a chance of either changing some voters’ minds, or at least incenting them to stay home. The latter would seem to be the best strategy.

Dora says:

September 28th, 2006 at 1:33 pm

Mark says: Well, only a ass would take it literally Does that mean we shouldn’t take anything you said in that paragraph literally? Get real. You could’ve just acknowledged that was bad form especially since you started out saying to find some kind of “transgression” but no, you gotta try to wiggle out of what you said. Tsk. Tsk.

Dora says:

September 28th, 2006 at 1:36 pm

You hit the nail on that one bsimon about how Wetterling is and should be running her campaign.

Dora says:

September 28th, 2006 at 1:36 pm

darn. forgot to close that tag again.

Sean says:

September 28th, 2006 at 1:38 pm

Funny, it’s the Bush Administration that calls the concept of a “prebate” an entitlement program. And it’s the largest one at that — about $700 billion a year. I think they are correct in labeling it so. It is redistributive in its intent and impact.

Eric Zaetsch says:

September 28th, 2006 at 1:39 pm

Mark - A federal sales tax is an idea you may like. There was much debate when the income tax was established, and the constitution was amended by popular processes to establish it beyond legal challenge.

I hope Bachmann agrees with you, and runs, in no uncertain waffling terms, 100% for a federal sales tax.

Please do what you can to convince her to do so. Flat earth, flat tax. Sounds like there’s a nice ring of similarity, for sloganeering.

The thing is Bachmann straddles and waffles and agrees with her friends about everything except giving stillbirths a birth certificate, naming stuff after Ronald Reagan, more days of prayer than Ramadan, and denying gay people civil rights if it appears likely to get votes. And teaching ID creationism as if it were science.

That stuff, she’s on record.

Tax reform, nada. No detail. Nothing you can debate, because there’s no real taking of a stand.

“Should consider” —- about federal sales tax and about nuking Iran - don’t take the option off the table, she says.

WHERE IS SHE, DECISIVELY, ON THE ECONOMIC ISSUES OTHER THAN IN OPPOSITION TO RAISING THE MINIMUM WAGE?????? POINT SOMETHING OUT TO ME THAT IS NOT IHOP WAFFLE. LIST WHAT YOU CAN ABOUT FIRM BACHMANN STANCES. PLEASE.

bsimon says:

September 28th, 2006 at 1:45 pm

Eric, the points you make are exactly those that Wetterling is not. You should be consulting to her campaign. Or Binkowski’s. Somebody has to wake up the people of the 6th to who they’re about to be ‘represented’ by in Congress.

(Though you are wrong on two things. 1) Flat Tax Fair Tax. 2) Major tax reform is necessary, be it flat or fair or something else.)

MR says:

September 28th, 2006 at 1:45 pm

Mark,
How are schools supposed to deal with “sensitive issues”? I think that overall, they do as good a job as possible considering that they’re in an impossible situation. As you say, everyone has the same right to express their views, so (generally) they try to teach tolerance for all views, which turns out to offend some people. But not teaching about those issues at all is doing a disservice to the students. So they’re stuck. What do you propose as a solution?

bsimon says:

September 28th, 2006 at 1:56 pm

In my 1:45 post it should say a ‘Flat’ Tax is not equal to a ‘Fair’ Tax. They are different names for different things. ‘Flat’ tax is applying one tax rate to all income tax payers, regardless of income. ‘Fair’ tax is a national sales tax. Binkowski is promoting the ‘Fair’ tax; Bachmann has conceeded it is worthy of discussion. Wetterling favors modification of the existing tax code.

Peder says:

September 28th, 2006 at 2:01 pm

MR, maybe the schools should take a pass at some of these issues. Especially with younger children. I’d be happy if elementary schools ignored gay relationships completely. General respect for each other without going into some of the specifics.

Bill Prendergast says:

September 28th, 2006 at 2:09 pm

Once again–Mark misses the point! Is someone keeping track of how many points he’s missed?

I put the “BIG QUESTION” to him, and simply refused to address it.

Let’s see if he can answer it the second time around:

1) Bachmann told her radio audience that her “”ban on gay marriage amendment referendum” may fail to pass in 2004.

2) Bachmann then told her audience that if her “ban on gay marriage amendment referendum” fails to pass in 2004, Minnesota public schools will “immediately” “begin teaching homosexuality” to our children.

So what actually DID happened in 2004, after she made these claims?

Well, 1)she didn’t get her referendum or gay marriage ban amendment in 2004.

So “THE BIG QUESTION”, then is: did the public schools “immediately” “begin teaching homosexuality” to kids in public schools, as Bachmann promised would happen?

mds says:

September 28th, 2006 at 2:14 pm

Mark, you cast about these sweeping generalizations about what public schools are doing/not doing (”politically correct world view”, “social engineering”) without providing a lick of evidence to bolster your statements. These are bold accusations with wide-reaching ramifications, if true. However, dictating these statements as truths (which is how I assume you want us to take them) without impartial supporting citations is irresponsible and really doing nothing more than parroting assorted right-wing rallying cries.

I encourage those reading these posts from Mark to not be blinded by his intelligently designed prose. These interpretive statements require impartial factual backup or they are worth nothing.

As usual, I encourage Mark to provide these. If he does, I will voraciously read them and learn from them. If he doesn’t, I assume that we’ll hear the same old platitudes of “I don’t have time to provide citations for conventional wisdom.” Otherwise known as a cop-out.

MR says:

September 28th, 2006 at 2:19 pm

Peder, that works…for a while. Then a 7-year-old comes to show-and-tell with pictures of his two mommies, and now the issue must be dealt with–probably right then and there too.
Then you have biology class. At this point, contoversy is unavoidable there because evolution is the scientifically accepted theory that is the basis for modern biology. You can’t very well take a pass on that and still keep the class.
In the end, schools do have to deal with these issues, like them or not.

L David says:

September 28th, 2006 at 2:44 pm

““…Our K-12 public school system, of which ninety per cent of all youth are in the public school system, they will be required to learn that homosexuality is normal, equal and perhaps you should try it. And that will occur immediately, that all schools will begin teaching homosexuality.”

Bachmann and the GOP has used this scare tactic.

Can’t it be taught as something that just exists without saying it’s normal or not normal or moral or immoral? Like it or not, it does exist in society and like it or not sometimes timmy does have two mommys or 2 daddys and like it or not, children will struggle with sexuality.

So why not include that it does exists in children’s education. Kids can make up their own minds what this mean in context of how they are raised, the environment around them, their own feelings, their own beliefs, their family’s beliefs etc… We short change our children if we assume they can’t think for themselves. We also short change the influence of parents.

If you want your child to have a sheltered life where they don’t have to any different than themselves exist…they can be home schooled.

Tommie says:

September 28th, 2006 at 2:46 pm

Would this blog be as much fun without Mark? BTW, I’ve been accused of being a liberal on this blog (for insisting on data and a coherent argument), but ocassionally I agree with him. I think he is asking serious questions about the agenda of the public schools. We took our kids out of them for reasons that sound very much like Mark’s characterizations. We chose a school that emphasized education, though the irony is that, from Mark’s point of view, it may be considered extremely liberal.

Peder says:

September 28th, 2006 at 2:49 pm

MR, if I was a teacher (I’m not, but my wife is) and a 7 year old brought in a picture of their two mommies, I’d probably stay quiet and let events take their course. If this student became the target of bullies, I’d make a point of saying something like ‘everyone comes from different situations and we must treat them all with respect’. My fear is that districts are so afraid of this type of situation that they’ll try and preempt it and teach very young children that homosexuality is ok.
I personally believe it’s just fine but I understand that parents want to deal with it on their own terms. Eric highlighted a case in MA where a book was being read to third(?) graders about two princes that found true love with each other. That’s too young for my taste and I presume many parents would agree.
By the time students are learning about evolution they’re teenagers and they’re more able to handle a nuanced discussion. Totally different issue. And even as those kids become older and more sexually aware, I’d rather that schools stressed general tolerance rather than take sides in the culture wars.

Paul S. says:

September 28th, 2006 at 2:54 pm

MR: Yes, that’s the point. Of course evolution like that will happen. And it probably will begin to happen pretty quickly, in fact probably already is happening some places, and maybe that’s fine, but to deny that it would be given a kick in the pants by legalized gay marriage is disingenuous.

Obviously it won’t lead to classes the day after or something; but I don’t think it’s unreasonable to say that an effect would begin quickly-bordering-on-immediately. And there’s only one direction it can go.

I support gay marriage. Really. That doesn’t mean I don’t think there are reasons to be a little careful. And it needs to be argued honestly. Forcing through major social change on the grounds of disingenuous argument and moral fervor leads to problems, like with abortion.

The honest response to Bachmann is to recognize she’s saying something somewhat genuine and just say: “Look, maybe, something like that, over time. That’s good. That’s part of why we view this marriage thing as so important: it’s a symbol, and symbols have consequences. But there’s not gonna be curricula added by Thursday. Even gay people aren’t that organized. But don’t worry in any event: the rough proportion of gay people has remained stable for centuries, and it is not our goal, or our expectation, to double that. 10% more, at most. Tops. We can promise that.”

Wetterling should just hire John Waters or somebody to deliver that as an ad. Seriously. Make the anti-gay-marriage fixation just seem foolish, even to people tempted by it.

bsimon says:

September 28th, 2006 at 2:57 pm

MR says, talking about same-gender parents of a student “Then you have biology class. At this point, contoversy is unavoidable there because evolution is the scientifically accepted theory that is the basis for modern biology. You can’t very well take a pass on that and still keep the class.”

How? What’s the controversy? In biology class it takes two genders for procreation. Excepting amoeba and the like. Funny thing, as a sidenote, those freaks at the Traditional Values Coalition sent me another email the other day about the evil transgender community’s goals for subverting schools and worse. Then I saw a special on PBS on how Grouper (a large fish) change gender mid-life. Surely we’d better not talk about such abominations in school!!

Michael Blaine says:

September 28th, 2006 at 2:57 pm

Something like the “Fair Tax” plan — a simplification of US tax policy would go along away toward restoring American economic vigor.

But Bachmann is wasting her breath even discussing it: it will never emerge from the rat’s nest of special interests in Washington.

Sometimes it strikes me how naive first-time candidates for office from Minnesota are about the ways of Washington. It will absolutely crush their fondest aspirations; survival is possible only if they quickly grow sufficiently cynical.

Paul S. says:

September 28th, 2006 at 3:02 pm

Peder and L. david, those are good comments. You’re right, it would be possible to simply treat it as a fact; when you look at it that way, what Bachmann’s problem boils down to is regret that we no longer actively condemn it. (Assuming we do now which we don’t.)

But I do think it’s a little non-fact-based about the nature of a great many public schools and teachers, who are very often decidedly liberal. Librarians, too, for that matter.

And it would be the case, maybe, that there would be no legal grounds for preventing someone from proseletyzing. I’m not sayng gay guys and gals would recruit, I’m saying some teachers would take it on as a mission, one more blessed liberal mission. That’s how a lot of liberals think about it now, after all, and maybe it is that.

In fact to deny there would be an effect seems like denying the basic nature of liberals: aggressive generosity. (Okay, maybe not “the” basic nature.)

Paul S. says:

September 28th, 2006 at 3:07 pm

Wow - Michael Blaine thinks the sales tax is a good idea. Careful, Michael - Patty Wetterling make take an ad out about you!

But seriously: it’s just so stupid for her to start talking about something being scary and unfair beause at first glance maybe it sort of seems that way. Every single economics-based idea in the world, I suspect, will look unfair from some perspective.

When your main goal is preventing any possibility of unfairness, that might get in the way of sound policy-making at times.

Paul S. says:

September 28th, 2006 at 3:10 pm

(The “it” I refer to as a teacher’s hypothetical “mission” would be to describe gayness as wonderful, not to therefore recruit little gays. I do believe the gay-numbers impact of an army of such teachers would be minimal, even counterintuitive. We all like to rebel against teachers.)

Peder says:

September 28th, 2006 at 3:14 pm

Paul, I think we’re in large agreement. I don’t know how much sway a teacher would have in any direction when it comes to young children and sexuality questions. But I’d rather let parents make those decisions on their own. When they become a little older (junior high?) is a much better time.

Mark says:

September 28th, 2006 at 3:29 pm

“How are schools supposed to deal with “sensitive issues”? ”

They are not. THey do not need to deal with homosexuality and other social issues. Their job is to teach basic academic skills. You can do this without having to resort to utilizing these issues that will leave many parents uncomfortable.

” Bachmann (or Wetterling, for that matter) being a nut has nothing to do with lying and distorting”

I was commenting on what my friend Bill P. stated. I do not have a problem with negative campaigning. If I was running a campaign and my grandmother was the opponent I would rip her throat out.

“So what actually DID happened in 2004, after she made these claims?”

Probably not. But that is not the point. Her followers really believe these things. It is troubling for them.

“As usual, I encourage Mark to provide these”

I will give you factual basis. Home schooling. This movement is incredibly pervasive. I think the idea of teaching your kids yourself is laughable, but people are removing their kids from the public schools in droves because of the way the schools teach these issues.

“Like it or not, it does exist in society and like it or not sometimes timmy does have two mommys or 2 daddys and like it or not,”

And parents can teach their children how they should view these things in the home. It is not the school’s job to introduce these ideas to the students. They teach 1+1=2 and that the derivative with respect to x of 3x squared is 6x. Not if D’ has one father who is black and one father who is white, how many fathers does D’ have? [D’ is one of my son’s best friends by the way].

“We chose a school that emphasized education, though the irony is that, from Mark’s point of view, it may be considered extremely liberal. ”

That is perfect with me. I would send a $4,000 voucher per kids if I was dictator. And, you need to remember that I am not a social conservtive.

“But Bachmann is wasting her breath even discussing it: it will never emerge from the rat’s nest of special interests in Washington.”

Bachman is really not a fair tax proponent.

“But I do think it’s a little non-fact-based about the nature of a great many public schools and teachers, who are very often decidedly liberal. ”

Ya think? I know somebody whose kid came home and told the class of 2nd graders that their will not be any oxygen left and we are all going to suffocate because we bad people cut down all the trees {never mind that most of the US is much more forested than 100 years ago}.

The way they teach history is baffling to me because it is intensely politically correct.

Bill Prendergast says:

September 28th, 2006 at 3:30 pm

I applaud the efforts to discuss “what kids should be taught about gays in school” and to discuss “the upside/downside of the consumption tax.”

But here’s the answer to the “Big Question” I put to Mark: despite Bachmann’s dire 2004 warning about what would happen if her “ban gay marriage” amendement didn’t get through in 2004: our schools are not “teaching homosexuality”, the public schools arent’ teaching students that “perhaps they should try homosexuality.” Bachmann was wrong and she was telling a lie–none of the consequences she warned about followed–legally or in fact–from her failure to get her state amendment banning gay marriage.

What you think we ought to do about educating children about the fact of gayness is interesting–but don’t miss the point: what Bachmann was telling her audience on that broadcast was crazy, irresponsible BS–she was trying to start homophobic panic in her audience so that she’d get a better turnout at her “no gay marriage” rally.

Irresponsible, crazy, deceitful, hateful–she’s a nut; the GOP has nominated a nut to represent us in Congress.

On the gay community and same-sex marriage: “This is a very serious matter, because it is our children who are the prize for this community, they are specifically targeting our children.” –Senator Michele Bachmann, appearing as guest on radio program “Prophetic Views Behind The News”, hosted by Jan Markell, KKMS 980-AM, March 20, 2004.

bsimon says:

September 28th, 2006 at 3:36 pm

Paul S. says “I’m not sayng gay guys and gals would recruit, I’m saying some teachers would take it on as a mission, one more blessed liberal mission. That’s how a lot of liberals think about it now, after all, and maybe it is that.”

Please don’t tell me you’re serious.

That’s not really relevant though, in the end. I thought this statement much more worthy of discussion: “A great many public schools and teachers… are very often decidedly liberal. Librarians, too, for that matter.”

Why do you suppose that is? I think its because we pay teachers the absolute minimum we can get away with & therefore attract people that have a passion for teaching, rather than people who are looking to maximise income. That these people tend to be liberal should be no surprise.

Paul S. says:

September 28th, 2006 at 3:44 pm

Bill, I just don’t quite agree with that: with your view of her as a result of teh statement.

Yes it was overheated and exaggerated. Yes it seems kind of insane. But she wasn’t telling a deep, profound political lie: that’s the point of the discussion, it seems to me. It’s just not enough to disqualify her for considerationo as a moral actor in the universe, which seems to be your goal, and which by the way is not inherently a tough position to mount a case against. Speaking personally, that’s all I’m trying to do.

You’re demonizing her. Literally, almost.

She’s just engaging in hyperbole from within her perspective. Granted, no changes resulted from her amendment not passing; that’s because her amendment not passing did not equate to widepread legalization of gay marriage. That’s the main reason you can describe it so confidently as utter nonsense. But on substance, it’s kind of a trivial point. What she’s at bottom referring to is that mythical day when gay marriage is somehow legalized.

She shouldn’t do that, frame it that way, but the language is roughly the same as the fear language that was used to oppose welfare reform - which, I would say, was really less grounded in actual resulting trends and understanding of how things work.

Paul S. says:

September 28th, 2006 at 3:46 pm

b, why would I not be serious about that? Seriosuly? I think you can tell I’m far from alarmed at the prospect, but come on: especially given that it would be an ongoing battleground in society, the whole gay debate I mean (it’s not gonna end with legalized gay marriage) - how can it be avoided?

mds says:

September 28th, 2006 at 3:46 pm

Mark, good responses above, for the most part. I appreciate that.

I do take issue with your statement that schools aren’t to deal with “sensitive issues”. In math class? No. However, you can’t teach a history class without delving into sensitivity. Let’s say you’ve got a class with twenty 6th graders. The teacher talks about Rosa Parks, what she did on that bus, and why it’s important in our history and in our country’s race relations. Let’s say one of those 20 kids has been raised by parents who hate black people. Those parents don’t want their child “exposed” to education that will “turn” their kids into lovers of black people.

Are you saying, Mark, that the history of the Civil Rights movement and what it’s done for this country shouldn’t be taught? It’s a sensitive issue to some parents.

Paul S. says:

September 28th, 2006 at 3:47 pm

(Maybe you missed my little clarification of what I mean by “mission.”)

Mark says:

September 28th, 2006 at 3:47 pm

““This is a very serious matter, because it is our children who are the prize for this community, they are specifically targeting our children.”

Again, this is a very common perception, even if it is true or untrue. People are very uncomfortable around homosexuality. The continued reference to “Not that there is something wrong with that” shows how this feeling pervades even Manhattan dwellers.

“I think its because we pay teachers the absolute minimum we can get away with ”

Guess what, everyone in a free market labor system is paid the minimum of what their employer can get away with.

Peder says:

September 28th, 2006 at 3:52 pm

bsimon, most teachers are liberal and it has nothing to do with their pay. And there are many many jobs that pay less without having an ideological slant. I don’t know the answer but that’s not it.
Bill, well you’ve convinced me that she was wrong about what would happen in schools in 2004. I guess that makes it ok for Wetterling to imply that she wants to raise taxes.

Mark says:

September 28th, 2006 at 3:54 pm

“Are you saying, Mark, that the history of the Civil Rights movement and what it’s done for this country shouldn’t be taught?”

I think that is taking the idea a little far. Racial issues are not tied up in religious beliefs like homosexuality is, at least that I know of.

However, it is clear that many teachers have gone overboard on these racial issues and many of their teaching methods can be questioned. [Everyone can fill in their own examples, you know they are out there].

Teaching historical concepts is great, even racial ones. Teaching white guilt is not.

Peder says:

September 28th, 2006 at 3:57 pm

mds, I don’t think that Rosa Parks is quite the same sensitive issue that homosexuality is.

Mark says:

September 28th, 2006 at 3:58 pm

In other words, the teacher should indicate how racism had its impacts on the blacks of the day and how this was part of the way Americans thought. They should not try to teach a “sensitivity”. The child should not be instructed they should feel bad about their own prejudice. The can come to that conslusion on their own.

bsimon says:

September 28th, 2006 at 3:59 pm

“I will give you factual basis. Home schooling. This movement is incredibly pervasive. I think the idea of teaching your kids yourself is laughable, but people are removing their kids from the public schools in droves because of the way the schools teach these issues.”

They are freaks. On this we can agree. Some cousins of mine were telling me about homeschooling, which I found rather surprising & complimented them on taking such an interest in their childrens’ education. Then they said “We teach at home because public schools teach that its ok to be gay.”

A couple years later, at my grandmother’s funeral, we learned that she’d had a son who was raised as her brother; most of us had never met him before. So my cousins were asking me who his friend that also attended the funeral was. What do you say to that? I can’t imagine how they would have responded, finding out that ‘it’ was in the family. ‘It’ being homosexuality.

Mark says:

September 28th, 2006 at 4:05 pm

“They are freaks”

Maybe, but htey still ahve the right to feel the way they do. They can also vote for their candidates based on those feelings. Perfectly natural expression of political interest.

On the “it” I have found that most people are more tolerant of homosexuals than they are of homosexuality. I doubt that your cousins would have had much problems with it, but you never know.

bsimon says:

September 28th, 2006 at 4:05 pm

Peder “most teachers are liberal and it has nothing to do with their pay. And there are many many jobs that pay less without having an ideological slant. I don’t know the answer but that’s not it.”

Well, your lack of a competing hypothesis is not a compelling rebuttal, to my eyes. I’m not sure what jobs you can list that require as much education and pay less. I can’t think of any. What would attract people to such an avocation, if not idealism?

bsimon says:

September 28th, 2006 at 4:07 pm

“I doubt that your cousins would have had much problems with it, but you never know.”

You may be right. I didn’t particularly feel like testing for that possibility at the time.

Mark says:

September 28th, 2006 at 4:09 pm

“I’m not sure what jobs you can list that require as much education and pay less”

I am not sure what you are saying. Applicants to education majors are usually the lowest end of the SAT scale. Teachers are paid very competitive wages and benefits. They work a 9 month year and have easy schedules with 2 weeks off at X-mas and usually a long spring break. After a short time in their career they are tenured. They can retire at the age of 55 with a very nice pension.

The average teacher makes more than $50,000 for a 9 month year. That is very competitive with engineering and other technical fields on a 12 month basis.

Mark says:

September 28th, 2006 at 4:09 pm

“You may be right. I didn’t particularly feel like testing for that possibility at the time. ”

And I dont blame you.

Paul S. says:

September 28th, 2006 at 4:13 pm

The sample size is small, but literally every single person I’ve ever met who was home-schooled was bright-eyed, ambitious, seemingly happy and emotionally balanced, and intelligent. Maybe it’s different in red states. Maybe there the parent-teachers are all git-r-done wives.

In grad school I briefly (briefly) dated such a home-schooled woman, a better-looking Ingrid Bergmann type. Our first date was the area premiere of “Stop Making Sense” - David Byrne was on hand. What could be more hip? Then we went to a downtown establishment that still exists, and around closing time suddenly, up on the bar TV, there appeared for 30 seconds or so, with full sound, a delightful snippet of hard-core porn. Not gay, if it matters. Really strange way for a relationship to begin.

Paul S. says:

September 28th, 2006 at 4:17 pm

“What would attract people to such an avocation, if not idealism?”

Let’s grant your point. And of course self-identified idealism is always correct.

But anyway, as Mark says, many - not all - teaching jobs are a sweet ride. (Perhaps making the drive for idealism even more acute?)

L David says:

September 28th, 2006 at 4:20 pm

Michele Bachman wants spoken prayer forced in public schools. Can it be a Muslim prayer one week, next week a Christian prayer, the next week a Pagan prayer, the next week a Wicken prayer, the next week a Scientology prayer? Gee…Michele Bachmann wants Pagan prayers tought in school.

Vouchers? That would rasie taxes. The bookkeeping, management of this system would be a nightmare. Plus, private schools have an unfair advantage because they don’t have to take physically challenged students, special needs students, english as a second language students..etc.. I wouldn’t be surprised if they were exempt from the “No Child Left Behind”.

bsimon says:

September 28th, 2006 at 4:23 pm

I’m not up to speed on salary surveys, but I don’t think fresh-out-of-school teachers are making $50K. Some engineers are. Yes, if you stick with it, you can get tenure, but even now, that’s not quite the deal it used to be. Its only anecdotal, but I know my stepmother & my father in law both retired early to avoid new contracts that would cut benefits & pensions. Given the discipline problems teachers have to deal with, not to mention paperwork requirements passed down from politicians on high, you have to wonder why anyone would take the job.

Peder says:

September 28th, 2006 at 4:23 pm

bsimon, let me take a swing at it then. I think I mentioned up above that my wife is a teacher. She and I have talked about some of this before. I don’t have an over-arching theory but I do know some of the routes. (Many generalizations to follow. Sorry, unavoidable.)
Some of them are guided by the same mission that Paul speaks of. This is especially true for the ones that are going to urban schools. They see their job as saving neglected children. Mostly liberals of the bleeding heart variety. These people would still be teachers if the pay was doubled or halved.
A truly enormous number of them become teachers because they don’t know what else to do and teaching sounds easy enough. Hang around at their cocktail parties and you’ll hear this story over and over. This doesn’t have anything to do with being liberal but it does explain the lower pay thing.
Many of them become union liberals. This makes them anti-conservative/liberal. I suspect the same thing happens in gov’t sector jobs.

bsimon says:

September 28th, 2006 at 4:25 pm

Paul S. says “many - not all - teaching jobs are a sweet ride. ”

I’ve yet to meet a teacher that’s said so. Maybe its a conspiracy to keep suckers from me from realizing what a sweet career option I’ve missed out on.

Doug Stene says:

September 28th, 2006 at 4:26 pm

“Mark says:
United States has a national debt of 37.4%.”

Actually our gross federal debt is 66.1% of our GDP and rising. It is not meaningless because we will be reaching $500 Billion per year in gross interest on the debt by 2009 and we will have to start paying back the principle on the Social Security Trust Fund part of that debt by about 2018.

It is irresponsible for us to shift that burden onto our children.

bsimon says:

September 28th, 2006 at 4:28 pm

Peder - I don’t disagree with your conclusion. Its a compelling hypothesis.

Bill Prendergast says:

September 28th, 2006 at 4:29 pm

Peder says:
Bill, well you’ve convinced me that she was wrong about what would happen in schools in 2004. I guess that makes it ok for Wetterling to imply that she wants to raise taxes.

I don’t think what I proved to you about Bachmann makes it okay for anybody to imply anything about anybody else. How’d you arrive at *that* conclusion, from what I said? I’m not a Wetterling supporter, by the way. The only reason I’m “soft on Wetterling” is that she’s the sanest candidate with the best chance of beating Bachmann. If Binkowski had bigger numbers, I’d be for him–because MB’s a dangerous nut.

Paul S–You tell me she shouldn’t have said things like that. But she did, and there we are. You tell me it’s just “hyperbole” from within her viewpoint. It’s much more than that. She is stirring up hatred against a minority community in order to improve her political position.

That’s not just “hyperbole.” That’s a politician campaigning by directing hatred and fear at an unpopular minority. That’s something we should all oppose, regardless of party preference, because it’s the strategy of a dangerous, amoral nut.

“What she’s at bottom referring to is that mythical day when gay marriage is somehow legalized.”

That’s not what she said. She said the “awful consequences” would follow “immediately” if her amendment wasn’t passed. Please, let’s not debate what you’d prefer her to have said, let’s discuss what she actually said–that’s what she’s accountable for, right?

It’s not a “trivial point” when an elected official lies to the public about legal consequences that would follow if we fail to heed her warning. That kind of lie is an abuse of elective office. Nothing trivial about it.

And I’m not “demonizing” her. I’m demonstrating to you that she’s a paranoid, dangerous nut; I have the facts and quotes to back that up. The reason I dwell on it is that the newspapers just don’t report the most extreme and crazy things she says and does. If they did, she could never get the GOP nomination. I guess it sounds like “demonizing” to you–but taking a candidate at their word and reporting their words is not “demonizing” them– it’s reporting the facts.

And anyway–she’s the one who believes in demons, not me.

Mark says:

September 28th, 2006 at 4:29 pm

“but I don’t think fresh-out-of-school teachers are making $50K”

In Minnesota the average starting teacher salary is $30,000 a year. That is for a 9 month year. Annualized that is a$40,000 a year salary.

To compare, the average starting salary of a chemical engineer was $52,000, accountin $43,000, marketing $38,000 etc…..

Mark says:

September 28th, 2006 at 4:32 pm

“gross federal debt is 66.1% of our GDP ”

But GROSS debt is meaningless. Much of the difference between gross and net is held by the Federal Reserve. They are paid interest on the federal debt they hold.

Do you know what they do with the interest income they receive?

“It is irresponsible for us to shift that burden onto our children.”

In 1962 the net federal debt was 42.7% of GDP. Did these people pass off their burden onto us??????

Mark says:

September 28th, 2006 at 4:35 pm

“I have the facts and quotes to back that up”

And I have pointed out to you that those facts and quotes resonate with a large audience. And, the hyperbole sits just a little on your side.

I disagree with just about everything Michelle Bachman stands for on the social side of the ledger [except for maybe the death penalty which I assume she is for]. Prayer in school, creationism, gay marriage, abortion. Many people agree with her on these issues and vote that way. That is why she is a formidable opponent.

Mark says:

September 28th, 2006 at 4:37 pm

“It’s not a “trivial point” when an elected official lies to the public about legal consequences that would follow if we fail to heed her warning”

sort of how the liberal “lied” about the impacts of welfare reform? Or the consequences of ending the ABM treaty? Or the consequences of Reagan deploying tactical nuclear missles in Europe? Or how the Democrats consistently scare senior citizens about the Republican Social Security and Medicare plans?

bsimon says:

September 28th, 2006 at 4:46 pm

Mark, you’ve found some lovely statistics about compensation. I’m still not sure you’ve refuted my point that there are not other career options that require the same or greater education, but pay less.

Mark says:

September 28th, 2006 at 4:50 pm

“the same or greater education”

Well, chemical engineers are paid more, but their education is much more competitive.

Teachers are paid right in the ballpark as other non-technical posiitions. THey need to stop whining.

They have been very succesful over time of convincing the public that they are so terribly underpaid.

Peder says:

September 28th, 2006 at 4:55 pm

Bill, sorry, I must have taken a wrong turn in the upper posts.

Howard Miller says:

September 28th, 2006 at 5:01 pm

more Orwell-speak has been floating about …

“the agenda of the public schools” as if there’s 1 over-riding social engineering blueprint …. what nonsense

“teach homosexuality” as if it is a point of advocacy …. again, nonsense.
some schools try to teach ABOUT homosexuality, which IS a normal condition in human societies, , with age-appropriate accurate information, whether some approve of it or not

“social engineering” v education - false distinction …. education is about learning how to function effectively in modern social contexts

if there’s a glaring current failing in education, it’s that so few Americans can speak a modern language besides English or understand cultures different than their own US subcultural niche …. the war in Iraq would be going better if more of our troops could converse in Arabic

Mark says:

September 28th, 2006 at 5:07 pm

“the war in Iraq would be going better if more of our troops could converse in Arabic ”

Makes the translation of “take that towel head” a much easier task when you are waterboarding them.

“education is about learning how to function effectively in modern social contexts”

Yes it is but the public school is not the only EDUCATION going on. The schools have their roles and parents have another. IT is clear that there is much resentment, even amongst “normal” parents that too much “social engineering” is going on.

Paul S. says:

September 28th, 2006 at 5:15 pm

Actually I just realized something: we’re taking your word for it that her hypothetical was related to the failure of her bill, rather than to the eventual and perhaps-as-a-result inevitable legalization of gay marriage. I’m not accusing you of anything; I’m just wondering - are you sure that was the whole meaning? Because it does seem sort of stupid.

But anyway - I still think it’s a trivial point, the distinction between results occuring from her bill not passing and gay marriage being approved, in this sense: It doesn’t affect her underlying point at all; and if she’d employed accurate language - “the day gay marriage is legalized” or something - it would have been very little less inflammatory from your point of view and would have been identical in terms of her demonizing purpose that you see.

Which is the more interesting point in what you write here, I think. Is it demonizing, to talk about schools having to teach it? I can see why you’d react that way; as if teaching it is so shocking and all. Yet - as the discussion here demonstrates - there are legitiamte concerns about that, or might be; and since I believe the basic assertion isn’t totally merit-less, and it’s somethign regular non-hating people might want to think about: hm.

But in any event is it enough to make me always perceive any of her policy positions as devoid of any morality? Which again is what you are insisting? No.

Paul S. says:

September 28th, 2006 at 5:27 pm

As I say way too often: to conclude something that extreme about someone, there really can’t be any flaws in the facts or perspectives you’re basing it on. Zero. None. Any significant ambiguity at all, then talk like that quickly becomes not helpful.

Like with that woman I was talking about, the one I dated. Was it my fault the saucy flick came on the bar TV? No. And yet I felt blamed. Demonized. And I certainly was shut out of any further serious consideration, for whatever reason. Is that fair?

By the way, I also believe that approaching even someone like Michele Bachmann - or at least her supporters - with a sense of some kind of generosity would help a lot with opposing her politically.

Doug Stene says:

September 28th, 2006 at 5:32 pm

“John Nothdurft says:
Some of the people on here need to read the New York Time’s best seller by Neal Boortz and Congressman John Linder called “The FairTax Book.” ”

I have read that book and I found it full of misinformation and the major mistake in the book was so obvious that it could only be considered a fraud.

The author’s main claim is that there is a 22% embedded tax so changing to a 23% sales tax would result in the price you pay remaining about the same. The problem is that the author’s also claim that you will take home your full pay check, including the money you currently pay in FICA and income taxes so they are counting the same money twice. The Harvard professor whose work they quote has informed them that the money can not be used for both purposes, but they continue to use that obvious misinformation in such a way that it is clearly intentional and a fraud.

The result is that the sales tax would cause prices to increase at least 15%. It would also increase the cost of goods the government purchase making the 23% rate to low to make it revenue neutral in terms of buying power. It would also require state and local governments to raise their taxes to maintain the same buying power.

While they claim the Prebate makes the tax fair, when you look at the price increases and loss of the Earned Income Tax Credit many of the lower income workers could lose significantly.

The book basically promises lower tax to everyone, but still claims to be revenue neutral along with economic miracles. It is a fraud.

Paul S. says:

September 28th, 2006 at 5:39 pm

Doug, I think the basic point is that it’s an intensely complicated idea and topic that has adherents or semi-adherenets from several political perspectives, and doesn’t deserve easy scary dismissal.

Paul S. says:

September 28th, 2006 at 5:59 pm

But yes, if the article in question is flawed like you say, so be it.

Bill Prendergast says:

September 28th, 2006 at 6:07 pm

Paul S says:
“Actually I just realized something: we’re taking your word for it that her hypothetical was related to the failure of her bill, rather than to the eventual and perhaps-as-a-result inevitable legalization of gay marriage. I’m not accusing you of anything; I’m just wondering - are you sure that was the whole meaning? Because it does seem sort of stupid.”

Yes. I’m sure. I have copies of the radio broadcasts in which she made the statements. I’m presenting them to you in the context they originally appeared. And the quotes are a transcription. She *did* like about the “immediate” legal and educational consequences of a failure to pass her amendment that year, 2004. And it was, and is, a stupid statement.

You are right to ask me if I’m sure; I think that calling an elected official a “nut” is a very serious matter, and I wouldn’t do it if I didn’t have the evidence–in this case, out of her own mouth, and in the context in which it originally appeared. There’s a lot of other evidence of her nuttiness, it’s not just the “anti-gay paranoia.”

There isn’t any ambiguity to appeal to; that is what she said and she was trying to mislead the listeners about the immediate legal and educational consequences of a failure to get her amendment through the legislature. How do I know that? She’s an attorney and a state legislator; she knew that the consequences she warned of wouldn’t be required by law, if her amendment wasn’t passed that year. She was *lying*, lying to an audience of conservative Christian listeners, the ones who are most likely to support her at the polls.

“there are legitiamte concerns about that, or might be; and since I believe the basic assertion isn’t totally merit-less, and it’s somethign regular non-hating people might want to think about: hm.”

The basic assertion is: if the same-sex marriage amendment doesn’t go through in 2004, the school will immediately begin “teaching homosexuality” in 2004. That was her basic assertion, and it was totally merit-less. Untrue, false, a lie to make people paranoid.

Paul S said:
is it enough to make me always perceive any of her policy positions as devoid of any morality? Which again is what you are insisting?

That is not what I’m insisting. Never said it, never argued it. I am not trying to make you, or anyone, “always perceive any of her policy positions as devoid of any morality?” I’m saying that an elected official who would make a patently false, hate-mongering statement like the one she made about the “immediate” consequences of a failure to get a state amendment banning gay marriage in 2004–is a lying, paranoid nut.

I stand by that position. Here’s another of Bachmann’s positions, from 2001, after she was elected:

On education laws passed by the GOP majority US Congress: “Federal law forms a new governance structure that opposes both free enterprise and representative government…A new national curriculum is used that embraces a socialist, globalist worldview; loyalty to all government and not America.” –Michael J. Chapman and Senator Michele Bachmann, “How New U.S. Policy Embraces a State-Planned Economy” © 2001

Howard Miller says:

September 28th, 2006 at 6:17 pm

re shifting federal taxing to consumption (skip the “Fair” tax label, fairness is defined by whether you win or lose on these changes) …

poor people use all their income to “consume” food, shelter, clothing, transportation … rich people can and do save some of their income… easier when there’s more money around to cover the basics

any scheme that shifts all taxing from income to consumption will disadvantage the poor on that basis … prebates and other “soften-the-blow” approaches require a lot of specifics to find if the net effect is a tax system more regressive than the current one

note … unless states and local governments quit taxing, no one is going to keep 100% of their paycheck under a federal flat-consumption tax approach …

as any legislation must go through the meat-grinder that is Congress, and as advocates of the rich control Congress more than advocates of the poor, i suspect the net bill would simply help our well-heeled citizens … as has been the pattern for a couple of decades

and finally, if it is revenue-neutral at the federal level, we’ll simply build more and more debt until interest payments consume tax revenues now going to defense and social welfare

Dora says:

September 28th, 2006 at 6:20 pm

Makes the translation of “take that towel head” a much easier task when you are waterboarding them

Holy crap Mark, another truly asinine comment. Or are you kidding again? Sheesh, your insistence about campaigning dirty, willingness to rip your grandmothers throat out if she was the opponent, findiing “transgressions” to go negative with, and now this. You’re letting your ugly side show too much today.

Doug Stene says:

September 28th, 2006 at 6:23 pm

“Mark says:
But GROSS debt is meaningless. Much of the difference between gross and net is held by the Federal Reserve.”

Actually the difference is mostly in government trust funds, like the Social Security Trust Fund, that will have to be paid back in the future. We have been using the surpluses in Social Security to make the reported deficit appear lower. The problem is that by about 2012 that annual surplus start to decrease and by about 2018 we will have to start paying back the IOUs held by the trust fund

“In 1962 the net federal debt was 42.7% of GDP. Did these people pass off their burden onto us?????? “

No, they actually acted relatively responsibly. In 1962 the gross debt was 53.4% of the GDP and while they ran annual deficits, they were small enough that the gross debt had decreased to 32.6% of the GDP by 1981. That gross debt increased again to 67.3% of GDP by 1996, before decreasing again 57.4% by 2001. It is projected to reach 68.2% of the GDP with no end in site.

We don’t need a perfectly balanced budget, but we do need to start reducing the percent of the GDP the debt represents.

Dora says:

September 28th, 2006 at 6:32 pm

MN teachers rank 21st in the nation for starting salaries.

From 1994-2000 teachers earned 18 cents for every new dollar earned by private sector employees with similar educational backgrounds.

In 2003-2004 the average teacher salary increased 2.2% while the national inflation rate in 2004 was 2.7%

Teacher characteristics, 2003-2004
97 percent of teachers are licensed
48 percent have advanced degrees
56 percent have taught more than 10 years

Keith says:

September 28th, 2006 at 7:30 pm

Not to post on topic, but I think the Wetterliing ad fits Bachmann. It is no more misleading then the way in which Bachmann has presented herself and her values, or lack of.

It’s not negative, though Bachmann is. So there is that difference…

Mark says:

September 28th, 2006 at 7:35 pm

“Sheesh, your insistence about campaigning dirty, willingness to rip your grandmothers throat out if she was the opponent, findiing “transgressions” to go negative with, and now this. ”

Finding nude photos of your political opponent is always fun.

Mark says:

September 28th, 2006 at 7:39 pm

“We don’t need a perfectly balanced budget, but we do need to start reducing the percent of the GDP the debt represents”

Why? It really is unimportant. We have had even larger debts to GDP….well over 100% in the WWII years. The market already takes all of this information into consideration. Inflation and interest rates are extremely low.

THe reason why NET debt is the most important variable is that is what has to actually be serviced from treasury. THis is the amount you have to pay interest on. The other debt is like you writing a debt to yourself.

Mark says:

September 28th, 2006 at 7:42 pm

“that will have to be paid back in the future”

True, but the government can just issue new notes to cover these amounts. You will have to start paying interest on the notes but you do not “have to pay them back”. Governments pay off their principle by issuing new debt instruments.

“We don’t need a perfectly balanced budget, but we do need to start reducing the percent of the GDP the debt represents.”

Then I want to hear about the $100 billion in non-defense spending cuts you are proposing.

Paul S. says:

September 28th, 2006 at 8:40 pm

I’ll think about all that Bill.

I’d clarify that when I use “the basic assertion” in the last post I’m not using it in a way that depends on what she ‘really’ meant or something. I’m going to what I see as the underlying thing worth talking about, regardless of what she said, and which she’d agree is the basic issue, and which on its own is plenty imflammatory enough for you I think.

You deny that you’re trying to convince us that she should be afforded no moral merit or something; I’m going by this paragraph:

“You see, you gotta understand, Bachmann. Bachmann is an extremist nut who does not feel bound by any code of personal ethics or responsibility. Bachmann thinks: whatever is to my personal advantage, is right, is “of the Lord.” She’s perfectly willing to distort her own record to gain a politcal advantage–or lie to her supporters to gain any kind of political advantage.”

You’re saying is all she thinks about is her own advantage and has no morals in pursuing that. Doesn’t that amount to what I’m perceiving in your view of her?

But anyway, decent dicussion. Polite and all. Her statement does boil down to a weird lie to an audience she’s trying to sway if the description is without blemish.

Ironically, given the above, I have nude photos of myself for which there is absolutely no market at all. I can’t give ‘em away, I tell ya.

Steve B says:

September 28th, 2006 at 8:51 pm

In response to bsimon’s hypothesis, I read or heard somewhere in the past couple of days that the lowest pay per years of education was among academics–college professors outside the schools of medicine. Unfortunately, I have no idea where I read this, so I can’t verify the validity.

Mark says:

September 28th, 2006 at 8:52 pm

“Ironically, given the above, I have nude photos of myself for which there is absolutely no market at all. I can’t give ‘em away, I tell ya.”

Do you have any photos of you and Patty Wetterling?

Mark says:

September 28th, 2006 at 8:55 pm

“net bill would simply help our well-heeled citizens … as has been the pattern for a couple of decades”

Again, another viewpoint held without any factual basis. THis is blatantly false in any measure. The “rich” pay a higher share of taxes now than ever before. Most households do not pay any income tax at all, and in fact, they have a negative income tax with their EIC.

When you realize that your claims are not worth your breath, will you finally stop making them? I know that CLASS WARFARE is the Democrats stock in trade, but it really is a lie.

Doug Stene says:

September 28th, 2006 at 9:04 pm

“Mark says:
We have had even larger debts to GDP….well over 100% in the WWII years.”

Yes, but that was following the great depression, during WWII and had a big push for public savings to finance the war. They also pushed to reduce that debt with surpluses or minimal deficits.

“The market already takes all of this information into consideration. Inflation and interest rates are extremely low.”

Maybe that is why the stock market has lost value to inflation during the Bush administration. Foreign governments have financed just about all of the debt and there are other factors that effect inflation and interest rates. The government borrowing does take money out of the equity market away from other types of investment and it still has the potential to raise interest rates in the future.

“True, but the government can just issue new notes to cover these amounts. You will have to start paying interest on the notes but you do not “have to pay them back”.”

It would convert the internal government debt into debt that would need to be borrowed from the public. I doubt that we can just borrow as much as we want without a significant impact in interest rates. How do you think those increased interest payment will be paid for? We would need to make significant butget cuts or increased taxes on the next generation.

“Then I want to hear about the $100 billion in non-defense spending cuts you are proposing. “

First you stop digging a deeper hole by not extending the estate tax cut, some of the higher income tax cuts and the many other tax cuts that some politicians are promising. Phasing our way out of Iraq will save a significant amount of money and there is no reason the defense department should be exempt from savings attempts. While I don’t have a detailed list of cuts, there are other areas that could be cut and everything needs to be on the table. Pay-As-You-Go (PAYGO) helped bring the budget to balanced during the 90’s and needs to be reinstated.

Bill Prendergast says:

September 28th, 2006 at 9:25 pm

Bill: “Bachmann thinks: whatever is to my personal advantage, is right, is “of the Lord.” She’s perfectly willing to distort her own record to gain a politcal advantage–or lie to her supporters to gain any kind of political advantage.”

Paul S.:
“You’re saying is all she thinks about is her own advantage and has no morals in pursuing that. Doesn’t that amount to what I’m perceiving in your view of her?”

Bill P:
No, Paul S.

Your view/of my view/of Bachmann is…

Paul S: (Bill P wants me to) always perceive any of her policy positions as devoid of any morality. Which again is what he is insisting.

My claim (Bachmann is perfectly willing to distort her own record to gain a political advantage–or lie to her supporters to gain any kind of political advantage) is different from the one you incorrectly attribute to me (People should always perceive any of Bachmann’s policy postiions as devoid of any morality.)

When you see the two statements side by side, you should be able to see that they do not mean the same thing. I vouch for the former, never said or claimed the latter. The claim I actually made and stand by is not an “always” statement. The claim I actually made and stand by doesn’t say that “any and all of her policy positions are devoid of morality.

Paul S. says:
Her statement does boil down to a weird lie to an audience she’s trying to sway if the description is without blemish.

You are right, her statement is a weird lie. I think the reason that she can enjoy the support she does in the Republican Party is that people simply don’t know she says this kind of stuff.

I refuse to believe that the rank and file voters of the GOP would would lend their support to a lying hate-monger. Bachmann’s attractive and personable and telegenic; she makes a great first impression on voters. When the TV cameras and reporters are around, she doesn’t do the “weird lie” stuff. But she is what she is–a paranoid, lying nut in an attractive, camera ready package.

I blame the media, including our sponsor, Mr. “Is That A Fack” Black, for not bothering to tell readers the significant facts about Bachmann–a six year long, documented trail of bulletproof quotes and evidence that lead to one inevitable and inarguable conclusion: she is a nut.

The day she was nominated for Congress was a dark day for Minnesota.

“This is not about hating homosexuals. I don’t. I love homosexuals.” –Senator Michele Bachmann, appearing as guest on radio program “Prophetic Views Behind The News”, hosted by Jan Markell, KKMS 980-AM, March 20, 2004.

Interviewer: “Answer the question, do you hate homos?”
Bachmann: “No, but ask my kids! (laughter)”–Senator Michele Bachmann, Tom Barnard Morning Show, KQRS, broadcast May 12, 2005.

Howard Miller says:

September 28th, 2006 at 9:56 pm

>

the rich pay a higher share of taxes because their share of total income has grown so dramatically relative to the vast majority (bottom 80%) and that occurred even tho the rich pay lower marginal rates on both earned and unearned income due to republican tax cuts

it’s simply bs to say most households don’t pay income tax - you, Mark, are simply misinformed -

i’m a professor in hr, work with surveys all the time, teach about compensation trends …and i get tired of your misrepresentations and slurs - you assert beyond your expertise constantly, and you do it with little grace

my opinions are no more valid than yours or anyone elses’, we all are entitled to our own opinions, well-founded or otherwise

but i’ll waste no more time quibbling with you over reality - no one is entitled to their own facts, and your assertions of fact don’t pass muster often enough

Eva Young says:

September 28th, 2006 at 10:20 pm

I’ll agree with Bill Prendergast, the Strib has yet to give the real story on Michele Bachmann. Bachmann is good at charming reporters. (I personally don’t understand why they keep on falling for her after lie after lie).

Dora says:

September 28th, 2006 at 10:21 pm

Amen Howard Miller, amen. Many have tangled with him over his assertions. Then again many just ignore him. Although it’s difficult to let egregious misrepresentations go by unchallenged. And sometimes I just like to yank his chain cuz he can be real outlandish like many comments today. You have to read alot of posts, if you can stomach it, to find an occasionally lucid comment.

Paul S. says:

September 28th, 2006 at 10:38 pm

I just saw a Bachmann ad, one I saw the other night, and it is striking how she manages to avoid showing anyone other than white people. It’s quite odd - doesn’t everyone make sure to at least appear inclusive? It almost has to be conscious.

Mark: no, but I got one of me with Everett Dirksen. That do any good? Oh wait - you mean nude. No, nothing, sorry.

Mark says:

September 29th, 2006 at 10:10 am

“it’s simply bs to say most households don’t pay income tax - you, Mark, are simply misinformed -”

No, I simply am not misinformed. THe effective income tax rate of the bottom two quintiles is negative. NOt only do the bottom two quintiles not PAY INCOME TAX, they get a negative income tax back in the form of earned income credits.

Out of about 140 million returns, 47.5 million returns in the lowest three quintiles have zero or negative tax liabilities. There are also 15 million non-filers which makes the total of returns without tax liabilites 62.3 million, almost half of all filers. {You can quibble with almost half or half. I only could find numbers on returns not households. I am confident that if you adjusted these numbers to households my claim of half would be true}.

The number of returns with zero or negative tax liability 33% since 2000 because of Bush’s tax proposal.

What I am saying is not OPINION, it is fact. The numbers speak for themselves.

Your opinions on tax shares are also not well founded and not supported by any evidence. I will post the numbers on that shortly.

bsimon says:

September 29th, 2006 at 12:48 pm

Mark says “Teachers are paid right in the ballpark as other non-technical posiitions. THey need to stop whining.

They have been very succesful over time of convincing the public that they are so terribly underpaid. ”

Teachers weren’t whining, I was. Though I wouldn’t call it whining, I’d call it an observation. Considering that our economy is relying more and more on non-manufacturing jobs, we need a more and more educated workforce. Seems to me like we should be making a better effort to attract the best teachers we can in order to generate the best workforce we can in order to keep the economy hummin’ along as best we can. There are a lot of folks that just look at schools as an inneficient waste of money; they may be inefficient, but I can’t for the life of me understand why people want to reduce investment in our future workforce. I won’t be retiring for 20 years, at a minimum, but I want to be damn sure the economy has the best workforce possible so I can enjoy my retirement living off of investments, rather than working at a fast food joint to make ends meet.

Mark says:

September 29th, 2006 at 1:49 pm

I understand that it was you “whining” but you are only repeating what they state.

I agree with you but I think it is also obvious that the current group of teachers we have are not doing a good job of preparing our children for those challenges you outline

With what you state, look to the party that has the ideas on education. That is the Republican Party. We support ideas such as school choice to give parents economic support to choose a top level school that is best for their children. We are strong advocates of charter schools. Republicans support merit pay to add incentive for quality people to enter the teaching force and get the economic rewards they deserve. Republicans support intense testing to determine the results of teaching and putting an incentive for schools to perform better. Repulicans also support making it easier for highly competent individuals to enter the teaching ranks from private/public careers that will really benefit the teaching enviroment. We have a Republican president who passed legislation that dramatically raised federal support of primary education. We put our money were our mouth is.

The Democrats oppose each and every one of these initiative. They are hide bound, supporting the union rule dominated teaching enviroment that no one is satisfied with. The only proposal the Democrats can conceive is give us more money.

bsimon says:

September 29th, 2006 at 2:00 pm

“We put our money were our mouth is.”

What an absolute crock. Have you heard the term “unfunded mandate” before? NCLB? I’m all for creative solutions to improving schools, but starving them of funding is a little too creative for me. Sending public dollars to religious schools is also too creative - and I’m the product of religious schools. The incessant wailing about the teachers unions being the problem sounds more like an excuse than anything. Has the GOP not learned how to work in any fashion beyond “us vs. them?” I agree that the Dems need to change their tune too, but to claim the GOP is pro-education is the biggest crock since whats-his-name claimed he’d be the “Education President.”

Paul S. says:

September 29th, 2006 at 2:17 pm

Can I just throw in a general comment on this teacher thing? Because aside from stats and all: this is a good example of what sometimes frustrates me about trying to arrive at basic, shared conclusions about something with my beloved semi-fellow liberals.

Look: we all know that for a whole lot of teachers, especially suburban teachers and to some extent almost any non-big-city-bad-neighborhood teacher, it’s a sweet gig, compared to a hell of a lot of other jobs, especially but not only because of the time off.

My mom was a teacher in suburban Chicago. She worked hard. She was a good teacher. She became chair of her department and graded papers at night and got frustrated dealing with administrators. But she was real paid well, for the time, and she got two-three months off completely, and the very generous retirement package is what still allows my very elderly parents to thrive and pretty much travel at will.

And even in her department, which was a large English Department, there were plenty of teachers who were fine people, I loved em (this was the school I went to oddly enough), but maybe since they didn’t have the added responsibilities of being a department chair they really treated the job as exactly what it was: a sweet gig with a great retirement plan. I’m relatively sure a number of them got high; one of them had time to nurture a career as a top Chicago-area amateur golfer.

And now, a good friend of my sister’s has had a career as a teacher and administrator in suburban Chicago schools: and it’s an even sweeter gig, and she knows it, and there’s absolutely no secret about it.

In conclusion: for a whole lot of teachers, it’s a sweet gig. To spend much time at all having to defend that statement is extremely frustrating.

It reminds of one time when I found myself in a dispute with a guy at a super-lefty site who refused to acknowledge that Iraq had been a major foreign policy issue, one of the top three and sporadically the biggest one, for the entire Clinton administration.

And it wasn’t just that he refused to acknowledge it; he was haughty about it. Like what a fool I was to believe that.

I understood why he did it, of course. He needs to believe for some reason that W pulled Iraq out of thin air as a policy concern.

On the teacher thing, I suppose it’s worth it to examine the extent to which the truism is actually true - is it really “most” for whom it’s a sweet gig? I don’t know for sure, but I don’t think it’s all that important for the basic point, which is that in talking about teachers as nobly underpaid, it’s important to remember that’s not really the case for a whole lot of them. A significant proportion of them.

Mark says:

September 29th, 2006 at 4:05 pm

“I’m all for creative solutions to improving schools, but starving them of funding is a little too creative for me. ‘

Whatever. Federal spending for K-12 spending increased 66% under George Bush. All of what you say is nothing but partisan rhetoric you have picked up from the Democrats.

Dora says:

September 30th, 2006 at 11:29 am

On the teacher thing, I suppose it’s worth it to examine the extent to which the truism is actually true - is it really “most” for whom it’s a sweet gig? I don’t know for sure, but I don’t think it’s all that important for the basic point, which is that in talking about teachers as nobly underpaid, it’s important to remember that’s not really the case for a whole lot of them. A significant proportion of them.

Of course it’s worth examining that point Paul because you make certain statements applying it to a large group based on your limited knowledge. I know teachers too and it doesn’t look like a “sweet gig” to me nor do they describe it as such. The ‘very generous’ retirement packages of the past no longer exist in today’s world and not just in teaching either. And comparing Chicago school districts of the past to MN schoold districts of today isn’t all that useful either.

The sweeping generalizations don’t help the discussion.

Mark says:

September 30th, 2006 at 9:18 pm

Teaching is an easy gig. THere is not doubt to that. GO to a school between 5 and 6 every day like I do…not a teacher or administrator to be found. It is a 9-3 gig with an hour off for lunch and an hour for prep.

Ed E says:

October 2nd, 2006 at 7:53 am

Okay Mark, now you did it. Now I know how completely, totally, unquestionably clueless you really are. I taught at the high school level for 5 years, working 70-80 hours a week in order to earn a measley $30,000 a year, with hopes of earning $39,000 a year after 25 years of service.

I got to school every day before 7 am and rarely left before 5 on days that I wasn’t coaching, advising or tutoring. And when I got home I usually had 2-3 more hours of work waiting for me. Friday night and Saturday were my only time off. I regularly worked Sunday and/or Sunday night. I graded papers and created tests and curriculum.

I taught 7 hours a day with 6 different kinds of classes. I taught biology, chemistry, physics, anatomy/physiology, life science and physical science every year. I rarely had any time off during the day because I had meetings with students and parents or I had students in asking for help.

I got a few months off in the summer, but considering the double-time I worked the rest of the year, the summer didn’t even come close to making up for it. It usually took a few weeks in June to recover and prep for the new year began in early/mid August.

Teaching is an “easy gig” for a very small group of people who teach and don’t work very hard at it. If a teacher doesn’t care, he/she can have a pretty easy life. Fortunately, there are not very many teaching professionals who fit that mold.

On the other hand, a teacher who really cares and wants to see kids succeed has the most challenging, thankless, stressful, low-paying career out there. The only thing teachers have left is the thankfulness of the students, which is slowly dissolving into nothing as well.

So, take your clueless comment and shove it up you know what! I’d love to see you get in a classroom. You’d get eaten alive.

Dora says:

October 2nd, 2006 at 8:35 am

Excellent post Ed E. Mark is clueless on so many things it’s hard to keep track. Perhaps he’s in school every day between 5-6 because he’s cleaning up the place.

Ed E says:

October 2nd, 2006 at 9:20 am

Thanks Dora. I forgot to add that my pay was based on also having earned a Master’s degree in education before I even started my career. There are so many people who want to talk about how nice teachers have it, but I’d like to see them give it a try. The retirement program may be nice, but I think it’s a huge over-statement to say that it’s a “nice” or “easy gig”. I wonder how Paul’s mom would feel about it if he told her she’d had an easy gig during her life!

I don’t know where Mark thinks he’d find anyone working between 5 and 6 on a regular basis. He’d better not go looking to get anything done at that time because he won’t find anyone anywhere unless they are finishing their night shift. What a complete dolt!

Mark says:

October 2nd, 2006 at 2:09 pm

“I don’t know where Mark thinks he’d find anyone working between 5 and 6 on a regular basis. ”

Teaching is a very easy career compared to other as far as what is expected from you and the work hours. The pace is slow and the demands few and far between.

Maybe it is hard dealing with a bunch of kids all day long. It is nOt the type of work I would want to do.

Ed E says:

October 2nd, 2006 at 2:55 pm

I’m not sure what classrooms you’ve seen in your life, but I’d have to think you had your eyes shut and your ears closed to think the pace is slow. Maybe in some elementary classrooms (as far as the academics) but even there the challenge of working with 20 or more little kids all day is exhausting. Mark, I strongly suggest you give it a try yourself before you call it easy. You wouldn’t last a week.

Dora says:

October 2nd, 2006 at 4:24 pm

Ed, maybe Mark is talking about Kindergarten.

Ed E says:

October 2nd, 2006 at 5:23 pm

Dora - I gotta admit. He’s got me ultimately confused on this one. I did give him credit for having some sense in the past, but I guess I went too far with that. I suppose kindergarten could be the case, but he’d be ignoring 95% of the teachers in that case, and I can’t imagine he would commit such a travesty!

Mark must have a pretty “good gig” if he is able to sit at work and post his mind-numbing comments every 5 minutes.

Dora says:

October 2nd, 2006 at 8:44 pm

“I can’t imagine he would commit such a travesty!”

I can. I’ve seen it in other threads.

Ed E says:

October 2nd, 2006 at 10:08 pm

Mark says:
“In Minnesota the average starting teacher salary is $30,000 a year. That is for a 9 month year. Annualized that is a$40,000 a year salary.”

You don’t have a clue how this works. Good teachers squeeze at least 11 months worth of work into those 9 months. There are no other professionals (other than a few crazed big city ones) that work harder than teachers do during the school year.

“Teachers are paid right in the ballpark as other non-technical posiitions. THey need to stop whining.”

And people wonder why we don’t have enough good, well-educated, professional teachers. When you pay them $30,000 a year with an advanced degree it will be pretty hard to get them. And then they get the added luxury of people like Mark telling them they are “whining” about being underpaid. I think Mark needs to get a dose of the real world.

big_question » Blog Archive » Is That a Fact? Bachmann opposes privatizing Social Security (not) says:

October 12th, 2006 at 12:18 am

[…] re debates. She then complained about a Wetterling ad that misstated her position on taxes (a criticism with which I agreed) . She then defended the accuracy of National Republican Con […]

Seks says:

November 12th, 2006 at 6:43 pm

Seks

Cerita cerita seks, cerita seks, seks melayu, seks hikayeleri. Seks Filmi.

myblogoycldeqwmd says:

November 20th, 2006 at 7:11 pm

myblogoycldeqwmd

nice blog i really like it.oycldeqwmd

home mortgage information says:

November 21st, 2006 at 5:21 am

room!activators concussion?provisionally devil:Inanna repositories pungent

myblogqdkdyjjuia says:

November 21st, 2006 at 7:54 pm

myblogqdkdyjjuia

nice blog i really like it.qdkdyjjuia

cheap cod says:

November 24th, 2006 at 6:55 am

vacationer,bagatelles canvases:lingered immediacy gatherer glacier!skinning

acne treatment says:

November 24th, 2006 at 4:17 pm

acne treatment

nice information oxmpobyhk

pimples gone says:

November 25th, 2006 at 4:46 pm

pimples gone

nice information pwdxylixk

acne medicine says:

November 26th, 2006 at 8:01 pm

acne medicine

nice information bpeoqrurn

Anonymous says:

December 3rd, 2006 at 4:25 am

nip?fallibility unsteadiness.hobbyists.gripping involves,printing

Anonymous says:

December 7th, 2006 at 10:50 pm

acidly butchers improviser.Europe extant infirm!

Anonymous says:

December 12th, 2006 at 1:36 am

pounce economize?Effie grudgingly spots firearms - Tons of interesdting stuff!!!

Anonymous says:

December 12th, 2006 at 3:20 pm

reflects Pteranodon,enduring muttered illegally signifies Frisian

bet says:

December 14th, 2006 at 10:35 am

barbarous?bromine boutique astral:thrives.brainstorms aplenty!Joes,

single cup coffee says:

December 23rd, 2006 at 2:37 pm

single cup coffee

great blog, keep it comming.

therapy says:

January 1st, 2007 at 8:30 pm

therapy

Your post is on target. Keep it up.

kimble auto parts hazelhurst says:

January 4th, 2007 at 5:08 am

kimble auto parts hazelhurst

Good observation, your ideas are right on.

kimble auto parts hazelhurst says:

January 4th, 2007 at 5:08 am

kimble auto parts hazelhurst

Good observation, your ideas are right on.

Isabella says:

January 7th, 2007 at 3:58 am

Ping

He appears to have been weened on a pickle

Matthew says:

January 10th, 2007 at 9:44 pm

Readed

People are about as happy as they make up their minds to be

Christopher says:

January 11th, 2007 at 5:25 am

Ping

Love will find a lay

Joseph says:

January 16th, 2007 at 5:31 am

Follow

He of whom many are afraid ought to fear many

decoration fall flower wedding says:

January 17th, 2007 at 4:53 pm

decoration fall flower wedding

decoration fall flower wedding kgpgsiutcr

best way to store bananas says:

January 18th, 2007 at 3:12 am

best way to store bananas

Thank you, I could not have sead it better my self.

bag black messenger prada says:

January 19th, 2007 at 10:12 pm

bag black messenger prada

bag black messenger prada hmbvfxeavr

cheap tramdol says:

January 27th, 2007 at 12:59 pm

Bonjour! What a super websight! Very refreshing to peruse from where we live in Paris (France). I eat frogs and drink wine. Woold like more informatons on this. Best regards! Mikael.

diet says:

February 6th, 2007 at 5:39 am

So very glad I found this truly great site :-)

Bonus says:

February 7th, 2007 at 1:01 am

Congratulation, it was very interesting surfing around here, It was a great pleasure for me to visit and enjoy you site. Keep it running!

safe antidepressant during pregnancy says:

February 15th, 2007 at 3:07 pm

safe antidepressant during pregnancy

This site is about safe antidepressant during pregnancy.

skittles com says:

February 16th, 2007 at 4:57 am

skittles com

Good information about skittles com.

movie star biography says:

February 16th, 2007 at 9:55 pm

movie star biography

movie star biography introduction

vet quetions says:

February 18th, 2007 at 6:09 pm

vet quetions

Relevant vet quetions

collector car title loan says:

February 19th, 2007 at 9:41 am

collector car title loan

This site is about collector car title loan.

jennifer veal says:

February 22nd, 2007 at 5:15 pm

jennifer veal

Reviews of jennifer veal.

computer security malicious software says:

February 23rd, 2007 at 10:19 pm

computer security malicious software

computer security malicious software introduction

hairy busty woman says:

March 16th, 2007 at 10:20 am

hairy busty woman

abrikoskos 2209471 –>hairy busty woman

dos equis amber says:

March 16th, 2007 at 11:35 am

dos equis amber

abrikoskos 2209471 Reviews of dos equis amber.

octagon girls says:

March 17th, 2007 at 8:00 am

octagon girls

abrikoskos 2209471 Actual articles about octagon girls and more.

profile watcher says:

March 17th, 2007 at 10:34 am

profile watcher

abrikoskos 2209471 This site is about profile watcher.

citiboyz says:

March 17th, 2007 at 2:23 pm

citiboyz

abrikoskos 2209471 citiboyz company

free amateur home vids says:

March 17th, 2007 at 3:40 pm

free amateur home vids

abrikoskos 2209471 –>free amateur home vids

Eric Black Ink » Blog Archive » Does Michele Bachmann stand for fair and accurate advertising? says:

October 18th, 2007 at 6:55 am

[…] By the way, during the campaign, the Wetterling campaign and her party allies aired ads that were at least as nasty and misleading, including one by Wetterling suggesting that Bachmann, a fanatical tax-cutter, favored a massive tax increase and another by the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee claiming that Bachmann had voted against tougher sentences for sex criminals (she favored an even tougher crime bill than the one she voted against). […]

Cindy Lou Who Costume says:

April 18th, 2009 at 5:31 pm

Cindy Lou Who Costume

Cindy Lou Who Costume

discount motor says:

May 11th, 2009 at 11:34 am

discount motor

discount motor

kids bunk beds says:

July 18th, 2009 at 9:36 pm

kids bunk beds

kids bunk beds

Set Of 2 Kid's White Windsor Chairs says:

July 18th, 2009 at 11:33 pm

Set Of 2 Kid’s White Windsor Chairs

The latest episode of the hit series “Is That a Fact?” dings Patty Wetterling pretty ha […]

Bodybuildingwarrior says:

July 30th, 2009 at 6:03 am

Bodybuildingwarrior

Bodybuildingwarrior

Gpistanbul says:

August 10th, 2009 at 5:27 pm

Gpistanbul

Gpistanbul

Please leave a comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

tamiflu cystic fibrosis Maker Of Tamiflu prevention of flu chilli cold and flu treatment Tamiflu Risks gilead science donald rumsfeld tamiflu tamiflu and parvo Parvovirus Tamiflu prophylactic tamiflu tamiflu roche Walgreen Flu Shoots swine flu death toll tamiflu roche dick cheney? Tamiflu Has Thermisol flu prevention signs who invented tamiflu Nursing Tamiflu rogaine flu symptoms pravachol nexium actos phentermine tamiflu Swine Flu Symptoms And Treatment flu shot and tylenol, stock ticker who makes tamiflu Tamiflu And Cystic Fibrosis does tamiflu work influenza a tamiflu Tamiflu For Prophylaxis Of Influenza aids tamiflu flu; 2009 flu multnomah county oregon Vacaville Ca 95687 Flu Shoots rumsfeld's growing stake in tamiflu fort detrick pediatric tamiflu Ingridients Of Tamiflu
buy tamiflu; swine flu symptoms prevention Tamiflu Baxter "generic for tamiflu" swine flu masks? Relenza Tamiflu Online tamiflu uk shop? tamiflu on line What Types Of Methods Of Prevention To The Spanish Flu tamiflu stomach flu Tylenol flu pregnant tylenol flu severe 718. Oculo And Tamiflu flu treatments without tylenol! "post-exposure tamiflu dosing" Flu Vaccine For Parkinsons Treatment home treatment of the flu tamiflu alcohol Great Swine Flu Epidemic relenza vs tamiflu tamiflu hemorrhoid Live Virus Flu Shoot tamiflu flu tamiflu dosage Tamiflu Antiviral Stockpiling Stomach flu and treatments stomach flu asprin tylenol 642. acheter tamiflu Swine Flu California what are some treatments of swine flu flu symptoms headache Veternarian Tamiflu flu shoots companys Swine flu swine flu 1976 147. Depo Provera Flu Interfere buy tamiflu without a prescription tamiflu antiviral stockpiling; Case Study Of Tamiflu tamiflu suspension no prescription tamiflu without a prescribtion Rumsfelds Growing Stake In Tamiflu Fort Detrick flu medication tamiflu swine flu protection Swine Flu Florida tamiflu adverse events molen flu shoots Tamiflu At Parvo cdc + swine flu treatment swine flu in ohio Swine Flu School Closings tamiflu for bird flu and 2007; tamiflu shelf life Tamiflu And Parvo tylenol flu night time tamiflu and effectiveness and safety Tamiflu In Cairo Egypt tamiflu in dogs! tamiflu for only 4 days Does Tamiflu Work ingridients of tamiflu intestinal flu Dangers Of Tamiflu number needed to treat for tamiflu "medwatch form for tamiflu" Swine Flu Australia wiki tamiflu tamiflu otc Swine Flu Locations
tamiflu recalls swine flu virus; Tamiflu Manufacturer Gilliad tamiflu manufacturer gilliad swine flu mask; Tamiflu Wikipedia panleukopenia and tamiflu rebate on tamiflu, Swine Flu Cartoons depo provera flu interfere! tamiflu and seizure Stomach Flu Treatments Symptoms swine flu conspiracy aids tamiflu flu; Breastfeeding Tamiflu tamiflu nausea tamiflu invent Swin Flu Precations

prevention of flu

cautions pediatric use tamiflu! Treatment For Stomach Flu gilead science donald rumsfeld tamiflu tamiflu and parvo Tamiflu Ingredian prophylactic tamiflu tamiflu roche Prozac Withdrawal Flu Symptoms swine flu death toll tamiflu roche dick cheney? Flu Affecting Blood Tests flu prevention signs who invented tamiflu Flu Shot While On Prednisone rogaine flu symptoms pravachol nexium actos phentermine tamiflu Swine Flu Prevention Posters
flu shot and tylenol,
rumsfeld's growing stake in tamiflu fort detrick Swine Flu Symptoms And Treatments Swine Flu does tamiflu work influenza a tamiflu Flu Shoot Clinics Northwestern Pa aids tamiflu flu; 2009 flu multnomah county oregon Chimney Flu rumsfeld's growing stake in tamiflu fort detrick pediatric tamiflu Veterinary Use Of Tamiflu buy tamiflu; swine flu wisconsin? Tamiflu Brand "generic for tamiflu" swine flu incubation

Symptoms Of Swine Flu

tamiflu uk shop? tamiflu medical Herbal Homeopathic Treatment For Swine Flu tamiflu stomach flu Tylenol flu pregnant tylenol flu severe 718. Tamiflu Is Dangerous Drug flu treatments without tylenol! philadelphia flu shoots Flu Shoot Clinics Erie Warren Pa home treatment of the flu tamiflu alcohol Tamiflu And Swine Flu Immunity relenza vs tamiflu tamiflu hemorrhoid Flu Shot And Depakote tamiflu flu tamiflu dosing instructions Tamiflu Cdc Stomach flu and treatments stomach flu asprin tylenol 642. acheter tamiflu Flu Vaccine And Ibuprofen what are some treatments of swine flu flu symptoms prilosec Tamiflu Related To Disasters flu shoots companys Swine flu swine flu 1976 147. Soap Note For Tamiflu buy tamiflu without a prescription tamiflu antiviral stockpiling; Tamiflu Reaction tamiflu suspension no prescription tamiflu where can you buy online There Is No Treatment For Swine Flu flu medication tamiflu swine flu symptoms and treatments Tamiflu Roche Dick Cheney tamiflu adverse events molen flu shoots Swine Flu Maps cdc + swine flu treatment swine flu in ohio Tamiflu Used Since tamiflu for bird flu and 2007; tamiflu shelf life Valtrex Flu tylenol flu night time tamiflu and effectiveness and safety Tamiflu Warnings tamiflu in dogs! tamiflu for only 4 days Flu Symptoms Prilosec ingridients of tamiflu intestinal flu Russian Tamiflu number needed to treat for tamiflu "medwatch form for tamiflu" Treating Parvo With Tamiflu wiki tamiflu tamiflu otc
Tamiflu Pros Cons tamiflu recalls swine flu virus; Tamiflu And Rumsfeld tamiflu manufacturer gilliad
swine flu mask; What Can You Get For Treatments Of The Flu panleukopenia and tamiflu price of tamiflu Tamiflu Long Term Damage depo provera flu interfere! tamiflu and seizure Is Tamiflu By Prescription Only swine flu conspiracy aids tamiflu flu; Tamiflu And Bird Flu tamiflu nausea tamiflu interfears with immune system How Long Will Tamiflu Last Storage prevention of flu chilli cold and flu treatment Rumsfelds Growing Stake In Tamiflu gilead science donald rumsfeld tamiflu tamiflu and parvo Rogaine Flu Symptoms prophylactic tamiflu tamiflu roche Tamiflu Indications swine flu death toll tamiflu roche dick cheney? Swine Flu Death flu prevention signs who invented tamiflu Are There Treatments For The Spanish Flu

rogaine flu symptoms

parvo with tamiflu Tamiflu For Children flu shot and tylenol, stock ticker who makes tamiflu Pharmacist Role In Flu Prevention Tamiflu does tamiflu work influenza a tamiflu Flu Medication Tamiflu aids tamiflu flu; 2009 flu multnomah county oregon Tamiflu Otc rumsfeld's growing stake in tamiflu fort detrick pediatric tamiflu Achat Tamiflu buy tamiflu; swine flu wisconsin? Over The Counter Tamiflu "generic for tamiflu" swine flu masks? Children Tylenol Flu

tamiflu uk shop?

tamiflu medical Tamiflu Related To Pan Epidemic Outbreak tamiflu stomach flu Tylenol flu pregnant tylenol flu severe 718. Flu Shoots Baltimore flu treatments without tylenol! philadelphia flu shoots Tamiflu Generic home treatment of the flu tamiflu 60 mg Flu Shoots Copanys relenza vs tamiflu tamiflu hemorrhoid Shelf Life Of Tamiflu tamiflu flu tamiflu dosing instructions Tamiflu Pregnancy Stomach flu and treatments stomach flu asprin tylenol 642. acheter tamiflu Does Tamiflu Contraindicate With Acetaminophen what are some treatments of swine flu flu symptoms headache Tylenol Flu Med flu shoots companys stopped tamiflu early Chaep Tamiflu Without Prescription buy tamiflu without a prescription tamiflu antiviral stockpiling; Tamiflu Z-pack tamiflu suspension no prescription tamiflu without a prescribtion Parvo Tamiflu flu medication tamiflu swine flu symptoms and treatments Donald Rumsfeld Tamiflu tamiflu adverse events molen flu shoots 2009 Flu Season Update cdc + swine flu treatment swine flu in ohio Tamiflu Flu tamiflu for bird flu and 2007; tamiflu shelf life Pandemic Flu Home Care Kits tylenol flu night time
tamiflu and effectiveness and safety
Tylenol Flu Shot tamiflu in dogs!
tamiflu drinking alcohol; Tramadol For Flu Symptoms ingridients of tamiflu how long does the flu last Alberta Coverage Tamiflu number needed to treat for tamiflu "medwatch form for tamiflu" Lipitor And Flu Like Symptoms wiki tamiflu tamiflu otc Can Pets Get The Swine Flu
tamiflu recalls swine flu virus; Swine Flu Veracruz tamiflu manufacturer gilliad swine flu mask; Flu Mask P95 panleukopenia and tamiflu rebate on tamiflu, Tamiflu Disorientation Dizziness depo provera flu interfere! tamiflu and seizure Swine Flu News swine flu conspiracy aids tamiflu flu; Tamiflu Dosage tamiflu nausea tamiflu interfears with immune system Flu Shot And Flagyl prevention of flu chilli cold and flu treatment Flu Shot gilead science donald rumsfeld tamiflu tamiflu and parvo Swine Flu Symptoms Treatment prophylactic tamiflu tamiflu roche Medication Tamiflu swine flu death toll tamiflu roche dick cheney? Swine Flu Symptoms And Treatments flu prevention signs who invented tamiflu Coumadin Flu Shot rogaine flu symptoms pravachol nexium actos phentermine tamiflu
Babies Tamiflu
flu shot and tylenol, rumsfeld's growing stake in tamiflu fort detrick Tamiflu For Children 2008 does tamiflu work influenza a tamiflu Wki Tamiflu aids tamiflu flu; 2009 flu multnomah county oregon Bird Flu rumsfeld's growing stake in tamiflu fort detrick pediatric tamiflu Order Tamiflu For Dogs buy tamiflu; swine flu wisconsin? False Negative Girl Died Avian Tamiflu "generic for tamiflu" swine flu locations Treatment Protocol For Family Members With Flu tamiflu uk shop? tamiflu on line Flu Shoots Dallas tamiflu stomach flu Tylenol flu pregnant tylenol flu severe 718. Swine Flu Incubation Period flu treatments without tylenol! "post-exposure tamiflu dosing" Reactions To Flu Shoots home treatment of the flu tamiflu alcohol

Tamiflu Length Of Storage

relenza vs tamiflu tamiflu flu Tamiflu For Acute Influenza A tamiflu flu tamiflu dosing instructions Treatment For The Flu Stomach flu and treatments stomach flu asprin tylenol 642. acheter tamiflu Is Tamiflu A Vaccine what are some treatments of swine flu flu symptoms prilosec How Does Tamiflu flu shoots companys Swine flu swine flu 1976 147. Procter And Gamble Tamiflu For Staff buy tamiflu without a prescription tamiflu and supply chain Japanese Star Anise Tamiflu tamiflu suspension no prescription tamiflu without a prescribtion What Is Swine Flu flu medication tamiflu swine flu protection How Is The Swine Flu Transmitted tamiflu adverse events Medication tamiflu avian bird flu medicine tamiflu 964. Tamiflu Immune System cdc + swine flu treatment swine flu in ohio Bestel Tamiflu tamiflu for bird flu and 2007; tamiflu shelf life Flu Shoots Companys tylenol flu night time tamiflu and effectiveness and safety Moin Flu Shoots
tamiflu in dogs!
tamiflu drinking alcohol; Tylenol Or Aspirn For Flu ingridients of tamiflu intestinal flu Buy Tamiflu Online
number needed to treat for tamiflu is tamiflu over the counter Tamiflu And Purchase wiki tamiflu tamiflu otc Flu Protection tamiflu recalls tamiflu Swine Flu Mexico tamiflu manufacturer gilliad swine flu mask; Lemon Cold And Flu Treatment panleukopenia and tamiflu rebate on tamiflu, Reactions To Tamiflu depo provera flu interfere! tamiflu and seizure Lipitor Flu Like Symptoms swine flu conspiracy aids tamiflu flu; New Swine Flu Cases tamiflu nausea tamiflu interfears with immune system Swine Flu Origin prevention of flu

chilli cold and flu treatment

No Rx Tamiflu gilead science donald rumsfeld tamiflu
tamiflu abnormal behaviour description!
Swine Flu Information prophylactic tamiflu

tamiflu producer

Tamiflu Cheap Without Prescription

swine flu death toll

tamiflu parov canine Molen Flu Shoots flu prevention signs Why is it called swine flu wiki tamiflu 309. Swine Flu Map reactions to tamiflu pravachol nexium actos phentermine tamiflu Tamiflu Scam flu shot and tylenol, stock ticker who makes tamiflu Flu Treatments does tamiflu work influenza a tamiflu Comprar Tamiflu aids tamiflu flu; 2009 flu multnomah county oregon Tamiflu Singapore Stockpile rumsfeld's growing stake in tamiflu fort detrick pediatric tamiflu Tamiflu Coupon buy tamiflu; swine flu wisconsin? Tamiflu Rumsfield "generic for tamiflu" swine flu masks? Topamax And Flu Like Symptoms tamiflu uk shop? tamiflu on line Treatment For Swine Flu tamiflu stomach flu Tylenol flu pregnant tylenol flu severe 718. Wirksamkeit Tamiflu flu treatments without tylenol! "post-exposure tamiflu dosing" Why Is It Called Swine Flu home treatment of the flu tamiflu alcohol Stomach Flu Asprin Tylenol relenza vs tamiflu tamiflu hemorrhoid Swine Flu Prevention tamiflu flu tamiflu dosing instructions Tamiflu Ingredients Stomach flu and treatments stomach flu asprin tylenol 642. acheter tamiflu Cold Vs Flu Symptoms what are some treatments of swine flu flu symptoms headache Cancun Swine Flu flu shoots companys stopped tamiflu early Triphala Cold Flu buy tamiflu without a prescription tamiflu antiviral stockpiling; Alternative Treatment For Bird Flu tamiflu suspension no prescription tamiflu without a prescribtion Tamiflu Cardiac Problems flu medication tamiflu swine flu symptoms and treatments Swine Flu Cases tamiflu adverse events molen flu shoots Treatments For Flu cdc + swine flu treatment swine flu in ohio Flu Vaccine Treatment For Multiple Sclerosis tamiflu for bird flu and 2007; tamiflu shelf life Alberta Prescription Tamiflu tylenol flu night time tamiflu and effectiveness and safety Symptoms Of The Swine Flu tamiflu in dogs! tamiflu for only 4 days Buy Tamiflu Obtain Your Prescription Online
ingridients of tamiflu how long does the flu last Prevention Of Flu number needed to treat for tamiflu "medwatch form for tamiflu" Swine Flu Hoax wiki tamiflu tamiflu otc Cdc Swine Flu tamiflu recalls tamiflu Baxter Avian Flu Vaccine Europe tamiflu manufacturer gilliad swine flu mask; Receive Flu Shoot Alabaster Al panleukopenia and tamiflu rebate on tamiflu,
Swine Flu Alternative Treatments Health depo provera flu interfere! tamiflu and children, Tamiflu Oral Suspension Expiration swine flu conspiracy aids tamiflu flu; Canada Pharmacy No Prescription Required For Tamiflu tamiflu nausea tamiflu invent Medwatch Form For Tamiflu prevention of flu chilli cold and flu treatment Swine Flu 2009 gilead science donald rumsfeld tamiflu tamiflu and parvo Tamiflu Otc Switch prophylactic tamiflu tamiflu roche Generic Version Of Tamiflu swine flu death toll tamiflu roche dick cheney? Does Tamiflu Interfer With Immune System flu prevention signs who invented tamiflu Tamiflu Without A Prescribtion rogaine flu symptoms pravachol nexium actos phentermine tamiflu Ibuprofen After Flu flu shot and tylenol, stock ticker who makes tamiflu Claritin Flu does tamiflu work influenza a tamiflu Flu Symptoms Fever aids tamiflu flu; 2009 flu multnomah county oregon Tamiflu New Zealand rumsfeld's growing stake in tamiflu fort detrick pediatric tamiflu Tamiflu Maker buy tamiflu; swine flu wisconsin? Flu Shoot Maryland Location "generic for tamiflu" swine flu masks? Child Didnt Finish All Tamiflu tamiflu uk shop? tamiflu on line Prednisone And Flu Shots tamiflu stomach flu Tylenol flu pregnant tylenol flu severe 718. Swine Flu Deaths flu treatments without tylenol! philadelphia flu shoots Tamiflu Fierce home treatment of the flu tamiflu alcohol Flu Like Symptons With Lexapro 20mg relenza vs tamiflu tamiflu hemorrhoid Can Nursing Homes Dispense Tamiflu tamiflu flu tamiflu dosing instructions What Are Flu Symptoms Stomach flu and treatments stomach flu asprin tylenol 642. acheter tamiflu Flu And Prednisone what are some treatments of swine flu flu symptoms prilosec Problems With Tamiflu flu shoots companys Swine flu swine flu 1976 147. Tamiflu Mercury buy tamiflu without a prescription tamiflu antiviral stockpiling; Swine Flu Mexico Tamiflu tamiflu suspension no prescription tamiflu where can you buy online Swine Flu And Tamiflu flu medication tamiflu swine flu symptoms and treatments Albertsons Central Forida Flu Shoots tamiflu adverse events Medication tamiflu avian bird flu medicine tamiflu 964. Swine Flu Texas cdc + swine flu treatment swine flu in ohio Best Flu Treatments tamiflu for bird flu and 2007; tamiflu shelf life Swine Flu H1n1 tylenol flu night time "tamiflu and dangers" Tamiflu Swf tamiflu in dogs! tamiflu for only 4 days Map Of Swine Flu ingridients of tamiflu intestinal flu Tamiflu Stock number needed to treat for tamiflu "medwatch form for tamiflu" Cdc Swine Flu Treatment wiki tamiflu tamiflu otc Occulo Tamiflu 60 Mg tamiflu recalls tamiflu Flu Tracker
tamiflu manufacturer gilliad swine flu in texas Avian Flu And Tamiflu panleukopenia and tamiflu rebate on tamiflu, History Physical Template For Tamiflu depo provera flu interfere! tamiflu and seizure Bird Flu Tamiflu swine flu conspiracy aids tamiflu flu; Where To Buy Allison-c For Bird Flu Prevention tamiflu nausea tamiflu invent Tamiflu 75 Mg Bulk Purchase Online prevention of flu chilli cold and flu treatment How Can I Buy Tamiflu gilead science donald rumsfeld tamiflu tamiflu and parvo Pig Flu prophylactic tamiflu tamiflu roche Rebate On Tamiflu swine flu death toll tamiflu roche dick cheney? Most Effective Antiviral For The Flu flu prevention signs Why is it called swine flu wiki tamiflu 309. H1n1 Flu Pandemic reactions to tamiflu pravachol nexium actos phentermine tamiflu The Swine Flu flu shot and tylenol, stock ticker who makes tamiflu Tamiflu Online Purchase does tamiflu work influenza a tamiflu Wiki Tamiflu aids tamiflu flu; 2009 flu multnomah county oregon Tamiflu Rumsfeld rumsfeld's growing stake in tamiflu fort detrick
panleukopenia and tamiflu Swine Flu Canada buy tamiflu; swine flu symptoms prevention Depo Provera Flu Shot "generic for tamiflu" swine flu masks? Medication Tamiflu Avian Bird Flu tamiflu uk shop? tamiflu on line When To Take Tamiflu tamiflu stomach flu Tylenol flu pregnant tylenol flu severe 718. Treatment Of Swine Flu flu treatments without tylenol! "post-exposure tamiflu dosing" Where Can You Buy Tamiflu home treatment of the flu tamiflu alcohol Government Purchase Of Tamiflu relenza vs tamiflu tamiflu hemorrhoid Shoud Businesses Stockpile Tamiflu tamiflu flu tamiflu dosing instructions Teens Abusing Tamiflu Stomach flu and treatments stomach flu asprin tylenol 642. acheter tamiflu Drug Interactions Tamiflu what are some treatments of swine flu flu symptoms prilosec H1n1 Flu Symptoms And Treatment flu shoots companys Swine flu swine flu 1976 147. Tamiflu Nausea buy tamiflu without a prescription tamiflu antiviral stockpiling; Buy Tamiflu tamiflu suspension no prescription tamiflu where can you buy online Avian Bird Flu Tamiflu flu medication tamiflu swine flu symptoms and treatments Swine Flu Vaccine tamiflu adverse events molen flu shoots Who Owns Tamiflu cdc + swine flu treatment swine flu in ohio Flu Tamiflu Powder tamiflu for bird flu and 2007; tamiflu shelf life Flu Shoots Az tylenol flu night time tamiflu and effectiveness and safety Kop Tamiflu tamiflu in dogs! tamiflu for only 4 days Roche Tamiflu ingridients of tamiflu intestinal flu What Is The Scientific Name For The Swine Flu number needed to treat for tamiflu "medwatch form for tamiflu" Diovan And Flu Like Symptoms wiki tamiflu tamiflu otc Tamiflu Cod tamiflu recalls tamiflu Tamiflu Hemorrhoid tamiflu manufacturer gilliad swine flu mask; Swine Flu Mask
panleukopenia and tamiflu prozac withdrawal symptoms flu; Ibuprofen And Flu Shots depo provera flu interfere! tamiflu and seizure Is Tamiflu An Anitbiotic swine flu conspiracy "12 mg tamiflu" Swine Flu Incubation tamiflu nausea tamiflu invent Cautions Pediatric Use Tamiflu prevention of flu chilli cold and flu treatment Swine Flu Italy gilead science donald rumsfeld tamiflu tamiflu and parvo Purchase Of Tamiflu prophylactic tamiflu tamiflu roche China Has Done Tamiflu To Death swine flu death toll tamiflu roche dick cheney? Swine Flu And Symptoms flu prevention signs who invented tamiflu Tamiflu Children rogaine flu symptoms pravachol nexium actos phentermine tamiflu Flu Shoot flu shot and tylenol, stock ticker who makes tamiflu H1n1 Flu Treatment does tamiflu work influenza a tamiflu Tamiflu Resistance In Avian Flu aids tamiflu flu; 2009 flu multnomah county oregon Tamiflu Uk Shop rumsfeld's growing stake in tamiflu fort detrick pediatric tamiflu Flu Symptoms Muscle Aches buy tamiflu; swine flu wisconsin? Tylenol Cold And Flu Severe "generic for tamiflu" swine flu masks? Swine Flu Humor tamiflu uk shop? tamiflu on line Tamiflu Cheney tamiflu stomach flu tucson flu shoots Swine Flu Prevention Video flu treatments without tylenol! "post-exposure tamiflu dosing" Roche Relenza Tamiflu home treatment of the flu tamiflu alcohol Stock Ticker Who Makes Tamiflu relenza vs tamiflu tamiflu hemorrhoid Tamiflu How It Works tamiflu flu tamiflu dosing instructions Tamiflu Avian Flu Stomach flu and treatments stomach flu asprin tylenol 642.
what are some treatments of swine flu
Tamiflu Injections flu symptoms prilosec flu prevention pamphlet Flu Treatment For Pediatrics

Swine flu swine flu 1976 147.

bird flu tamiflu Flu Shoot Clinics Jamestown New York tamiflu antiviral stockpiling; tamiflu suspension no prescription Treatment For Equine Flu tamiflu without a prescribtion

flu medication tamiflu

Who Manufactures Tamiflu swine flu symptoms and treatments symptoms of the swine flu Cold And Flu Prevention And Treatment molen flu shoots cdc + swine flu treatment Symtoms Of Swine Flu swine flu in ohio tamiflu for bird flu and 2007; Cold And Flu Remedy tamiflu shelf life tylenol flu night time Tamiflu Off The Shelf tamiflu and effectiveness and safety tamiflu how it works What Are The Symptoms Of Swine Flu tamiflu for only 4 days ingridients of tamiflu At This Time What Is The Best Treatment For Swine Flu intestinal flu number needed to treat for tamiflu Actos Flu Symptoms None S Objection "medwatch form for tamiflu" wiki tamiflu Tamiflu Pharmaceutical tamiflu otc tamiflu recalls Phenergan For Flu tamiflu tamiflu manufacturer gilliad Tamiflu Is Made From swine flu mask; panleukopenia and tamiflu Intestinal Flu rebate on tamiflu, depo provera flu interfere! Flu Symtoms tamiflu and seizure swine flu conspiracy California Flu aids tamiflu flu; tamiflu nausea Ordering Tamiflu tamiflu invent prevention of flu Mexico Swine Flu chilli cold and flu treatment gilead science donald rumsfeld tamiflu Swine Flu San Antonio tamiflu and parvo prophylactic tamiflu H1n1 Deaths Were They On Tamiflu tamiflu roche swine flu cartoons Who Invented Tamiflu tamiflu roche dick cheney? flu prevention signs Swine Flu Natural Treatments who invented tamiflu rogaine flu symptoms Tamiflu Revlu pravachol nexium actos phentermine tamiflu flu shot and tylenol, Tamiflu And Breastfeeding stock ticker who makes tamiflu does tamiflu work Swine Flu Symptoms influenza a tamiflu acme philadelphia flu shoots acme Buy Tamiflu No Perscription 2009 flu multnomah county oregon rumsfeld's growing stake in tamiflu fort detrick Tamiflu And Effectiveness And Safety pediatric tamiflu buy tamiflu; Roche And Employer Stockpiling Tamiflu swine flu wisconsin? "generic for tamiflu" Swine Flu Treatments swine flu masks? tamiflu uk shop? Stopped Tamiflu Early tamiflu on line tamiflu stomach flu Treatment For Flu Tylenol flu pregnant tylenol flu severe 718. flu treatments without tylenol! Alternative Flu Prevention "post-exposure tamiflu dosing" home treatment of the flu Survived H1n1 Without Tamiflu tamiflu alcohol relenza vs tamiflu Does Tamiflu Fight Avian Flu tamiflu hemorrhoid tamiflu flu Role Of Np Flu Tamiflu tamiflu dosing instructions Stomach flu and treatments stomach flu asprin tylenol 642. Tamiflu Cystic Fibrosis acheter tamiflu what are some treatments of swine flu
Flu Map
flu symptoms prilosec flu prevention pamphlet Order Tamiflu No Prescription

Swine flu swine flu 1976 147.

bird flu tamiflu Tamiflu Brain Virus tamiflu antiviral stockpiling; tamiflu suspension no prescription Taking Tamiflu As A Precaution tamiflu without a prescribtion flu medication tamiflu Tamiflu Adverse Reactions Recent News swine flu symptoms and treatments tamiflu adverse events Thermisol In Tamiflu molen flu shoots cdc + swine flu treatment Flu Pandemic Declared swine flu in ohio tamiflu flu Swine Flu Treatment tamiflu shelf life tylenol flu night time Counterfeit Tamiflu tamiflu and effectiveness and safety tamiflu in dogs! Avian Flu tamiflu for only 4 days ingridients of tamiflu Tamiflu Roche intestinal flu number needed to treat for tamiflu Rumsfeld Tamiflu "medwatch form for tamiflu" wiki tamiflu Tamiflu And Avian Flu tamiflu otc tamiflu recalls Tamiflu Use In Avian Flu tamiflu tamiflu manufacturer gilliad Flu Shoot Radition Treatment swine flu mask; panleukopenia and tamiflu Tamiflu Effective rebate on tamiflu, depo provera flu interfere! Tamiflu And Pregnancy tamiflu and seizure swine flu conspiracy Tamiflu Medicene aids tamiflu flu; tamiflu nausea Number Needed To Treat For Tamiflu tamiflu invent prevention of flu Tamiflu Resistance chilli cold and flu treatment gilead science donald rumsfeld tamiflu Search Results Tamiflu tamiflu and parvo prophylactic tamiflu Flu Season tamiflu roche swine flu death toll Flu Portland Or tamiflu roche dick cheney? flu prevention signs Tamiflu Danger who invented tamiflu rogaine flu symptoms Tamiflu For Swine pravachol nexium actos phentermine tamiflu flu shot and tylenol, Food Poisoning Vs Flu stock ticker who makes tamiflu does tamiflu work California Swine Flu influenza a tamiflu aids tamiflu flu;
Ibuprofen And Flu Vaccine 2009 flu multnomah county oregon remedy for stomach flu The Spanish Flu pediatric tamiflu buy tamiflu; Flu Headache Aleve swine flu wisconsin? "generic for tamiflu" Does President Obama Have Stock In Tamiflu swine flu masks? tamiflu uk shop? Duration Of Flu Symptoms tamiflu on line tamiflu stomach flu Swine Flu Protection Tylenol flu pregnant tylenol flu severe 718.

flu treatments without tylenol!

H1n1 Swine Flu "post-exposure tamiflu dosing" h1n1 flu symptoms Tamiflu Parov Canine tamiflu alcohol relenza vs tamiflu Homeopathic Treatments For Stomach Flu tamiflu hemorrhoid tamiflu flu Tamiflu Manufacturer tamiflu dosing instructions Stomach flu and treatments stomach flu asprin tylenol 642. Whats In Tamiflu acheter tamiflu weaponized swine flu; Buy Tamiflu W No Prescription flu symptoms prilosec flu shoots companys Swine Flu Facts Swine flu swine flu 1976 147. buy tamiflu without a prescription Chilli Cold And Flu Treatment tamiflu antiviral stockpiling; tamiflu suspension no prescription Tamiflu Invent tamiflu without a prescribtion flu masks Tamiflu Oseltamivir Phosphate swine flu symptoms and treatments tamiflu adverse events Flu Strain In Idaho molen flu shoots cdc + swine flu treatment Flu Remedies swine flu in ohio tamiflu flu Flu Prednisone Shot tamiflu shelf life tylenol flu night time Flu Treatment For Children tamiflu and effectiveness and safety tamiflu in dogs! Cheapest Tamiflu tamiflu for only 4 days ingridients of tamiflu Swine Flu Statistics intestinal flu

number needed to treat for tamiflu

Singulair Flu Shot "medwatch form for tamiflu" what if i don't finish tamiflu Natural And Alternative Bird Flu Treatments tamiflu otc tamiflu recalls Treatment For The Avian Flu tamiflu tamiflu manufacturer gilliad Stomach Flu Symptoms swine flu mask; panleukopenia and tamiflu Over The Counter Flu Prevention rebate on tamiflu, depo provera flu interfere! Buy Tamiflu Without Prescription tamiflu and seizure swine flu conspiracy Tamiflu Canine Parvovirus aids tamiflu flu; tamiflu nausea Swine Flu In Texas tamiflu invent prevention of flu Latest Reports On Swine Flu chilli cold and flu treatment gilead science donald rumsfeld tamiflu Flu Prevention tamiflu and parvo prophylactic tamiflu Government Tamiflu tamiflu roche swine flu death toll Got Better H1n1 Without Tamiflu tamiflu roche dick cheney? flu prevention signs Avian Flu Treatment who invented tamiflu rogaine flu symptoms Philadelphia Flu Shoots pravachol nexium actos phentermine tamiflu flu shot and tylenol, Star Anise In Tamiflu stock ticker who makes tamiflu does tamiflu work North Carolina Swine Flu influenza a tamiflu aids tamiflu flu; Flu Symptoms 2009 flu multnomah county oregon rumsfeld's growing stake in tamiflu fort detrick Bird Flu Pandemic pediatric tamiflu buy tamiflu; Swine Flu Course Progression Duration Treatment Tamiflu swine flu wisconsin? "generic for tamiflu" Order Tamiflu swine flu masks? tamiflu suspension Tamiflu Dose For Influenza tamiflu on line tamiflu stomach flu Swine Flu Test Tylenol flu pregnant tylenol flu severe 718. flu treatments without tylenol! Swine Flu In Cancun "post-exposure tamiflu dosing" home treatment of the flu Health Care Flu Shoot tamiflu alcohol relenza vs tamiflu

Swine Flu Prevention Kits

tamiflu hemorrhoid tamiflu dosing instructions Swine Flu Death Toll tamiflu dosing instructions Stomach flu and treatments stomach flu asprin tylenol 642. Tamiflu Or Relenza acheter tamiflu weaponized swine flu; Tamiflu Dangers flu symptoms prilosec flu shoots companys

Tamiflu Sale

Swine flu swine flu 1976 147. bird flu tamiflu Tamiflu Suspension No Prescription tamiflu antiviral stockpiling; tamiflu suspension no prescription Flu Shoots Pittsburgh Pa tamiflu without a prescribtion flu medication tamiflu Tamiflu American Pediatric Association swine flu symptoms and treatments tamiflu adverse events Acheter Tamiflu molen flu shoots cdc + swine flu treatment Tamiflu Sign Guidlines swine flu in ohio tamiflu flu Flu Vaccine Tylenol tamiflu shelf life tylenol flu night time Hiv Flu tamiflu and effectiveness and safety tamiflu how it works Influenza A Tamiflu tamiflu for only 4 days ibuprofen for children after flu Tamiflu Contains Mercury intestinal flu

number needed to treat for tamiflu

Flu "medwatch form for tamiflu" "when to take tamiflu" Tamiflu Bestellen tamiflu otc tamiflu recalls Counterfeit Tamiflu Avian Bird Flu tamiflu tamiflu mexico; Tylenol Severe Flu

swine flu in mexico!

ontario tamiflu & immunosuppressed patients? Online Tamiflu rebate on tamiflu, depo provera flu interfere! Tamiflu Banned Japan tamiflu and seizure swine flu conspiracy Tamiflu And To Relenza. aids tamiflu flu; tamiflu medical San Luis Potosi Swine Flu tamiflu invent prevention of flu How Long Does The Flu Last chilli cold and flu treatment gilead science donald rumsfeld tamiflu Tylenol Flu Pregnant tamiflu and parvo prophylactic tamiflu Herbal Tamiflu Recipe tamiflu roche swine flu death toll Tamiflu Safety Elderly tamiflu roche dick cheney? flu prevention signs Swine Flu Tamiflu who invented tamiflu rogaine flu symptoms Mexico Flu pravachol nexium actos phentermine tamiflu flu shot and tylenol, Tamiflu During Pregnancy stock ticker who makes tamiflu does president obama have stock in tamiflu Gilead Tamiflu Stocks Value influenza a tamiflu aids tamiflu flu; Tamiflu Interfears With Immune System
2009 flu multnomah county oregon remedy for stomach flu Swine Flu Masks pediatric tamiflu buy tamiflu; Tamiflu Wonkette

swine flu wisconsin?

flu vaccine! Tamiflu Orders No Prescription swine flu masks? tamiflu uk shop? Tamiflu Order Without A Prescription tamiflu on line tamiflu stomach flu Que Es El Tamiflu Tylenol flu pregnant tylenol flu severe 718. flu tracker How Fast Does Tamiflu Work "post-exposure tamiflu dosing" home treatment of the flu Flu Shot While Taking Prednisone tamiflu alcohol relenza vs tamiflu Oculo Tamiflu 60 Mg tamiflu hemorrhoid tamiflu flu Flu Shot Side Effects tamiflu dosing instructions star anise in tamiflu Tamiflu Black Box acheter tamiflu what are some treatments of swine flu Remedy For Stomach Flu flu symptoms prilosec flu shoots companys Flu Vaccine And Coumadin Swine flu swine flu 1976 147. buy tamiflu without a prescription Bactrim And Tamiflu Together tamiflu antiviral stockpiling; tamiflu suspension no prescription Buy Tamiflu Without A Prescription tamiflu without a prescribtion

flu masks

Tamiflu Donald Rumsfield swine flu symptoms and treatments symptoms of the swine flu Pravachol Nexium Actos Phentermine Tamiflu molen flu shoots cdc + swine flu treatment Drug Trials For Tamiflu swine flu in ohio tamiflu for bird flu and 2007; Canine Tamiflu tamiflu shelf life tylenol flu night time Pediatric Tamiflu Approved For Pandemic Purchase tamiflu and effectiveness and safety tamiflu in dogs! Tamiflu Suspension tamiflu for only 4 days ingridients of tamiflu What Are The Ingredients intestinal flu

number needed to treat for tamiflu

Tamiflu Adverse Events "medwatch form for tamiflu" "when to take tamiflu" Tamiflu By Vbulletin tamiflu otc tamiflu recalls Drug Treatment For Swine Flu tamiflu tamiflu manufacturer gilliad Buy No Online Prescription Tamiflu swine flu mask; panleukopenia and tamiflu Motrin Cold And Flu rebate on tamiflu, depo provera flu interfere!

Safeway Flu Shoots

tamiflu and seizure
still died after taking tamiflu Veterinary Tamiflu aids tamiflu flu; tamiflu nausea Cold And Flu Prevention tamiflu invent prevention of flu Tamiflu Abnormal Suicidal Behaviour chilli cold and flu treatment gilead science donald rumsfeld tamiflu Bird Flu Treatment tamiflu and parvo prophylactic tamiflu Tamiflu Without A Prescription tamiflu roche swine flu cartoons Purchase Tamiflu tamiflu roche dick cheney? flu prevention signs Coumadin And Flu Shot who invented tamiflu
rogaine flu symptoms
Stomach Flu And Treatments pravachol nexium actos phentermine tamiflu flu shoot clinics northwestern pa Tamiflu In Vaccine stock ticker who makes tamiflu does tamiflu work Tamiflu Where Can You Buy Online influenza a tamiflu aids tamiflu flu; Tamiflu Capsules 2009 flu multnomah county oregon rumsfeld's growing stake in tamiflu fort detrick Swine Flu 1976 pediatric tamiflu buy tamiflu; Cold Flu Motrin swine flu wisconsin? "generic for tamiflu" Dosing Tamiflu swine flu masks? tamiflu uk shop? Swine Flu Symptoms Prevention tamiflu on line tamiflu stomach flu Swine Flu Symptons Tylenol flu pregnant tylenol flu severe 718. flu treatments without tylenol! Tamiflu Singapore Tender "post-exposure tamiflu dosing" home treatment of the flu Swine Flu Syptoms And Treatments tamiflu alcohol relenza vs tamiflu Tamiflu And Seizure tamiflu hemorrhoid tamiflu flu Flu Prevention Salt tamiflu dosing instructions Stomach flu and treatments stomach flu asprin tylenol 642. Tamiflu Recalls acheter tamiflu what are some treatments of swine flu What Is The Swine Flu flu symptoms prilosec flu shoots companys The Truth About Swine Flu Swine flu swine flu 1976 147. buy tamiflu without a prescription Nose Bleeds And Tamiflu tamiflu antiviral stockpiling; tamiflu suspension no prescription False Flu Security tamiflu without a prescribtion flu medication tamiflu Tamiflu Relenza swine flu symptoms and treatments tamiflu adverse events Tamiflu Histori molen flu shoots canine tamiflu Prozac Withdrawal Symptoms Flu swine flu in ohio tamiflu for bird flu and 2007; Anthony Fauci Tamiflu tamiflu shelf life tylenol flu night time Tamiflu Purchase tamiflu and effectiveness and safety tamiflu in dogs! Treatment Swine Flu tamiflu for only 4 days ingridients of tamiflu Swine Flu Symptom intestinal flu no rx tamiflu Avian Bird Flu And Tamiflu "medwatch form for tamiflu" wiki tamiflu Swine Flu Treatment Recommendations tamiflu otc tamiflu recalls The Flu tamiflu tamiflu manufacturer gilliad Tamiflu Prescribing Directions For Swine Flu swine flu mask; panleukopenia and tamiflu Tamiflu Generic Name rebate on tamiflu, depo flu provera symptom Tamiflu Abnormal Behaviour Description tamiflu and seizure swine flu conspiracy Tylenol Cold And Flu aids tamiflu flu; tamiflu nausea Generic For Tamiflu tamiflu invent prevention of flu Increased Effexor Rx Flu Like Symptoms chilli cold and flu treatment gilead science donald rumsfeld tamiflu Complete Entire Treatment Of Tamiflu tamiflu and parvo prophylactic tamiflu Swine Flu Wisconsin tamiflu roche swine flu death toll Tamiflu Abnormal Behaviour Documentation tamiflu roche dick cheney? flu prevention signs Flu Symptoms And Treatment who invented tamiflu rogaine flu symptoms Tamiflu Side Effects pravachol nexium actos phentermine tamiflu flu shot and tylenol, Soap Note On Tamiflu stock ticker who makes tamiflu does tamiflu work Cdc Flu Shot Tylenol influenza a tamiflu aids tamiflu flu; Tamiflu For Bird Flu And 2007 2009 flu multnomah county oregon rumsfeld's growing stake in tamiflu fort detrick Tamiflu Recent News pediatric tamiflu buy tamiflu; Tamiflu And Children swine flu wisconsin? "generic for tamiflu" Tamiflu Influenza A swine flu masks? tamiflu uk shop? Tamiflu No Prescription tamiflu on line tamiflu stomach flu Signs Of Swine Flu Tylenol flu pregnant tylenol flu severe 718. flu treatments without tylenol!

Buy Generic Tamiflu

"post-exposure tamiflu dosing" h1n1 flu symptoms Flu Treatment tamiflu alcohol relenza vs tamiflu Tamiflu Pediatrics tamiflu hemorrhoid tamiflu flu Find Buy Tamiflu Ebay tamiflu dosing instructions Stomach flu and treatments stomach flu asprin tylenol 642. N1h1 Flu Prevention N95 Respirator Guidelines acheter tamiflu
what are some treatments of swine flu
Swine Flu Conspiracy flu symptoms prilosec flu map? Fda Recommendations Using Tamiflu With Children Swine flu swine flu 1976 147. buy tamiflu without a prescription Ambien Flu tamiflu antiviral stockpiling; tamiflu suspension no prescription Tamiflu And Seizure And Class Action tamiflu without a prescribtion

flu medication tamiflu

H1n1 Flu Symptoms swine flu symptoms and treatments symptoms of the swine flu Alternative Treatment Swine Flu molen flu shoots cdc + swine flu treatment Oseltamivir Tamiflu Benefits Risks Community swine flu in ohio tamiflu for bird flu and 2007; Pandemic Tamiflu tamiflu shelf life tylenol cold and flu severe Who Makes Tamiflu tamiflu and effectiveness and safety tamiflu in dogs! Hsbc Tamiflu Tablets Flu Pandemic tamiflu for only 4 days ingridients of tamiflu Tamiflu Suspension Without Prescription intestinal flu number needed to treat for tamiflu Post-exposure Tamiflu Dosing "medwatch form for tamiflu" wiki tamiflu Swine Flu Info tamiflu otc tamiflu recalls Tamiflu Japan tamiflu tamiflu manufacturer gilliad Natural Swine Flu Prevention swine flu mask; panleukopenia and tamiflu Fda Tamiflu rebate on tamiflu,

depo provera flu interfere!

Tamiflu Synovitis tamiflu and seizure swine flu alternative treatments health? Dog Flu aids tamiflu flu; tamiflu nausea 12 Mg Tamiflu tamiflu invent prevention of flu

Swine Flu Death Victems On Tamiflu

chilli cold and flu treatment flu vaccine! Pediatric Tamiflu tamiflu and parvo prophylactic tamiflu Lexapro Flu tamiflu roche swine flu death toll Central Forida Flu Shoots tamiflu roche dick cheney? flu prevention signs Swine Flu Epidemic who invented tamiflu reactions to tamiflu Tamiflu Alcohol pravachol nexium actos phentermine tamiflu flu shot and tylenol, Can You Get Better From H1n1 Without Tamiflu stock ticker who makes tamiflu does tamiflu work Tamiflu Liquid influenza a tamiflu aids tamiflu flu; Stomach Flu Duration 2009 flu multnomah county oregon rumsfeld's growing stake in tamiflu fort detrick Swine Flu History pediatric tamiflu buy tamiflu; Tylenol Flu Pills swine flu wisconsin? "generic for tamiflu" Tamiflu Bird Flu Virus swine flu masks? tamiflu uk shop? Bactrim For Sinus Infection Flu tamiflu on line tamiflu stomach flu Flu Like Symptoms From Prilosec Tylenol flu pregnant tylenol flu severe 718. flu treatments without tylenol! Tamiflu Prophylaxis "post-exposure tamiflu dosing" home treatment of the flu Tamiflu Gilead Rumsfeld tamiflu alcohol relenza vs tamiflu Medience Tamiflu Children tamiflu hemorrhoid tamiflu flu I Get Tamiflu tamiflu dosing instructions Stomach flu and treatments stomach flu asprin tylenol 642. Mexican Flu acheter tamiflu what are some treatments of swine flu How Did Swine Flu Start flu symptoms prilosec flu shoots companys Swine Flu Jokes Swine flu swine flu 1976 147. buy tamiflu without a prescription
Swine Flu In Ohio
tamiflu antiviral stockpiling;
tamiflu price Flu Shot Treatment For Multiple Sclerosis tamiflu without a prescribtion flu masks Tamiflu Cpt Code swine flu symptoms and treatments tamiflu adverse events Tamiflu Oral Suspension molen flu shoots cdc + swine flu treatment Tamiflu From Canada swine flu in ohio tamiflu for bird flu and 2007; 2009 Flu Multnomah County Oregon tamiflu shelf life tylenol flu night time How Long Do I Take Tamiflu tamiflu and effectiveness and safety tamiflu in dogs! Philadelphia Area Flu tamiflu for only 4 days ingridients of tamiflu Flu Remedy Tamiflu intestinal flu no rx tamiflu What Organism Causes The Swine Flu "medwatch form for tamiflu"
wiki tamiflu
Buy Tamiflu Lowest Cost tamiflu otc tamiflu parvo Bird Flu Symptoms tamiflu

tamiflu manufacturer gilliad

Tamiflu Cost Comparison swine flu mask; ontario tamiflu & immunosuppressed patients? Tylenol Cold And Flu Recall rebate on tamiflu, depo provera flu interfere! Symptoms Swine Flu tamiflu and seizure swine flu conspiracy Hong Kong Flu aids tamiflu flu; tamiflu nausea Swine Flu tamiflu invent prevention of flu Antiviral Tamiflu chilli cold and flu treatment
gilead science donald rumsfeld tamiflu
Tamiflu Efficacy tamiflu and parvo parvo tamiflu Tamiflu Buy tamiflu roche swine flu death toll Swine Flu Preventions tamiflu roche dick cheney? flu prevention signs Tylenol Cough And Flu who invented tamiflu reactions to tamiflu How To Prepare For Swine Flu pravachol nexium actos phentermine tamiflu flu shot and tylenol, Swine Flu Ohio stock ticker who makes tamiflu does tamiflu work Swine Flu Update influenza a tamiflu aids tamiflu flu; Treatment Of Flu 2009 flu multnomah county oregon rumsfeld's growing stake in tamiflu fort detrick Tamiflu On Line pediatric tamiflu buy tamiflu; Tamiflu Ontario swine flu wisconsin? "generic for tamiflu" Tamiflu For Treating Parvo In Puppies swine flu masks? tamiflu uk shop? Flu Treatments Without Tylenol tamiflu on line tamiflu stomach flu Fle Vaccinations Tamiflu Tylenol flu pregnant tylenol flu severe 718. flu treatments without tylenol! Otc Tamiflu "post-exposure tamiflu dosing" home treatment of the flu Tamiflu Longer Than 2 Days tamiflu alcohol relenza vs tamiflu Tamiflu Oseltamivir tamiflu hemorrhoid tamiflu flu Tamiflu Cost tamiflu dosing instructions Stomach flu and treatments stomach flu asprin tylenol 642. Alendronic Acid Tamiflu acheter tamiflu what are some treatments of swine flu Ibuprofen For Children After Flu flu symptoms prilosec flu shoots companys

How Does Tamiflu Work

Swine flu swine flu 1976 147. bird flu tamiflu National Guard Dispatched To Protect Tamiflu Supplies
tamiflu antiviral stockpiling; tamiflu revlu Triazolone Tamiflu tamiflu without a prescribtion flu medication tamiflu Tylenol Flu swine flu symptoms and treatments tamiflu adverse events Panleukopenia And Tamiflu molen flu shoots cdc + swine flu treatment On-line Tamiflu Prescreening For Prophylaxis swine flu in ohio tamiflu for bird flu and 2007; What Is The Action Of Tamiflu tamiflu shelf life tylenol flu night time Cold Vs Flu tamiflu and effectiveness and safety tamiflu in dogs! Texas Swine Flu tamiflu for only 4 days ingridients of tamiflu Swine Flu Pictures intestinal flu no rx tamiflu What Are Some Treatments Of Swine Flu "medwatch form for tamiflu" wiki tamiflu Tamiflu Elderly tamiflu otc tamiflu recalls Tamiflu Not Effective H5n1 tamiflu tamiflu mexico; Symptons Of Swine Flu swine flu in mexico! panleukopenia and tamiflu Relenza Vs Tamiflu rebate on tamiflu,

depo provera flu interfere!

Flu Prevention Signs tamiflu and seizure swine flu alternative treatments health? Tamiflu Influenza aids tamiflu flu; tamiflu nausea Flu Vaccine Tylenol Cdc tamiflu invent prevention of flu Photos Of Tamiflu chilli cold and flu treatment gilead science donald rumsfeld tamiflu Disposal Expired Tamiflu tamiflu and parvo prophylactic tamiflu Zoloft Interact Cold Flu tamiflu roche swine flu death toll Tamiflu For West Nile Virus tamiflu roche dick cheney? flu prevention signs Cold And Flu Treatments who invented tamiflu rogaine flu symptoms History Of Swine Flu
pravachol nexium actos phentermine tamiflu
flu shoot clinics northwestern pa Home Remedy For Swine Flu stock ticker who makes tamiflu does tamiflu work Where Can I Get Tamiflu influenza a tamiflu aids tamiflu flu; Bronchitus Tamiflu 2009 flu multnomah county oregon rumsfeld's growing stake in tamiflu fort detrick Tamiflu When Pregnant pediatric tamiflu buy tamiflu; Tamiflu For Only 4 Days

swine flu wisconsin?

flu vaccine! Swine Flu Vaccination swine flu masks? tamiflu uk shop? Mercury In Flu Shots tamiflu on line tamiflu stomach flu History Of Flu Vaccination Tylenol flu pregnant tylenol flu severe 718. flu treatments without tylenol! Swine Flu Virus "post-exposure tamiflu dosing" home treatment of the flu Cdc Indications For Tamiflu tamiflu alcohol relenza vs tamiflu Tamiflu Melbourne

tamiflu hemorrhoid

tamiflu dosing instructions Swine Flu Containment Treatment tamiflu dosing instructions Stomach flu and treatments stomach flu asprin tylenol 642. Not Completing Tamiflu For 5 Days acheter tamiflu what are some treatments of swine flu Tamiflu Online flu symptoms prilosec flu shoots companys Reactions To The Flu Shoot Swine flu swine flu 1976 147. buy tamiflu without a prescription How Long Does The Flu Usually Last tamiflu antiviral stockpiling; tamiflu suspension no prescription Flu Shot And Symmetrel tamiflu without a prescribtion flu masks What If I Dont Finish Tamiflu swine flu symptoms and treatments tamiflu adverse events Flu Shoot Locator molen flu shoots cdc + swine flu treatment Tamiflu High Blood Pressure swine flu in ohio tamiflu for bird flu and 2007; Tamiflu 15 Million Ecological Disaster tamiflu shelf life tylenol flu night time Stomach Flu 2009 Boulder County Schools tamiflu and effectiveness and safety tamiflu how it works Tamiflu Purchase Avian Bird Flu tamiflu for only 4 days ingridients of tamiflu Pharmacist Role In Flu Tamiflu intestinal flu number needed to treat for tamiflu Flu Medicine Tamiflu "medwatch form for tamiflu" wiki tamiflu Tamiflu Prescription Drug tamiflu otc tamiflu recalls Tamiflu Warning tamiflu tamiflu manufacturer gilliad Flu Shoots Dallas Locations swine flu mask; panleukopenia and tamiflu Bird Flu Prevention rebate on tamiflu, depo provera flu interfere! Lexapro And Flu Symptons tamiflu and seizure swine flu conspiracy Tamiflu Purchase Mexico aids tamiflu flu; tamiflu nausea Differential Smear Of Flu Patient tamiflu invent prevention of flu Tamiflu Reactions chilli cold and flu treatment gilead science donald rumsfeld tamiflu Depo Provera Flu Shot Interfere tamiflu and parvo prophylactic tamiflu Still Died After Taking Tamiflu tamiflu roche swine flu cartoons Tamiflu Iingredients

tamiflu roche dick cheney?

flu injection vs plavix Mail Order Tamiflu who invented tamiflu rogaine flu symptoms Tylenol Flu Severe pravachol nexium actos phentermine tamiflu flu shot and tylenol, Order Tamiflu Paypal stock ticker who makes tamiflu does tamiflu work Prednisone And The Flu Shot influenza a tamiflu aids tamiflu flu;
Tamiflu Drug Interactions 2009 flu multnomah county oregon
remedy for stomach flu
Swine Flu Precautions pediatric tamiflu babies tamiflu Tamiflu Dry Syrup swine flu wisconsin? "generic for tamiflu" Ap News Tamiflu swine flu masks? tamiflu uk shop? Swine Flu Symptoms Incubation Time tamiflu on line tamiflu stomach flu Tamiflu Canada Tylenol flu pregnant tylenol flu severe 718. flu treatments without tylenol! Depo Flu Provera Symptom "post-exposure tamiflu dosing" home treatment of the flu Tamiflu Shelf Life tamiflu alcohol rebate on tamiflu, Newsday Counterfeit Tamiflu tamiflu hemorrhoid tamiflu flu Tamiflu Prescribing tamiflu dosing instructions star anise in tamiflu Flu Valtrex acheter tamiflu what are some treatments of swine flu Is Tamiflu Over The Counter flu symptoms prilosec flu shoots companys Voltarol Flu Like Symptom Swine flu swine flu 1976 147. buy tamiflu without a prescription Swine Flu April 26
tamiflu antiviral stockpiling; tamiflu revlu Symptoms Treatment For The Flu tamiflu without a prescribtion

flu georgia

Swine Flu Updates swine flu symptoms and treatments symptoms of the swine flu Childrens Tylenol Plus Flu molen flu shoots cdc + swine flu treatment Newborns And Tamiflu swine flu in ohio tamiflu flu Tamiflu And Supply Chain tamiflu shelf life tylenol flu night time Blue Cross Tamiflu Nebraska tamiflu and effectiveness and safety tamiflu in dogs! Merck Tamiflu tamiflu for only 4 days ibuprofen for children after flu Swine Flu Cdc intestinal flu no rx tamiflu Flu Injection Vs Plavix "medwatch form for tamiflu" wiki tamiflu Flu Symptons From Lexapro tamiflu otc tamiflu recalls Tamiflu Tender Singapore tamiflu tamiflu manufacturer gilliad How Long Is The Flu Contagious swine flu mask; panleukopenia and tamiflu Tamiflu Sales rebate on tamiflu, depo provera flu interfere! Tamiflu Swine Flu tamiflu and seizure swine flu conspiracy Cdc Swine Flu Prevention aids tamiflu flu; tamiflu nausea Prevention Swine Flu tamiflu invent prevention of flu Flu Vaccine And Prednisone chilli cold and flu treatment
gilead science donald rumsfeld tamiflu
Flu Mask tamiflu and parvo pharmacist role in flu tamiflu Bird Avian Flu Prevention, Treatment Tamiflu tamiflu roche swine flu death toll Philadelphia Flu Shoots Acme tamiflu roche dick cheney? flu prevention signs How Does Flu Affect Hearing who invented tamiflu rogaine flu symptoms Swin Flu pravachol nexium actos phentermine tamiflu flu shot and tylenol, Tamiflu Parvo stock ticker who makes tamiflu does tamiflu work Tamiflu Vaccines And Antiviral Drugs influenza a tamiflu aids tamiflu flu; Tamiflu Inf 2009 flu multnomah county oregon rumsfeld's growing stake in tamiflu fort detrick Flu Masks pediatric tamiflu buy tamiflu; Tamiflu Mfg swine flu wisconsin? "generic for tamiflu" Tamiflu Infants Powder swine flu masks? tamiflu suspension Tylenol Severe Cold Flu tamiflu on line tamiflu stomach flu Tamiflu Available By Prescription Only Tylenol flu pregnant tylenol flu severe 718. flu treatments without tylenol! Tamiflu Symptoms For A Week "post-exposure tamiflu dosing" home treatment of the flu Swine Flu Outbreak tamiflu alcohol relenza vs tamiflu Weaponized Swine Flu tamiflu hemorrhoid tamiflu flu How Tamiflu Works tamiflu dosing instructions Stomach flu and treatments stomach flu asprin tylenol 642. Who Should Stockpile Tamiflu acheter tamiflu what are some treatments of swine flu Home Treatment Of The Flu flu symptoms prilosec flu shoots companys Swine Flu Cartoon Swine flu swine flu 1976 147. buy tamiflu without a prescription Ontario Tamiflu Immunosuppressed Patients tamiflu antiviral stockpiling; tamiflu suspension no prescription Origin Of Swine Flu tamiflu without a prescribtion flu medication tamiflu Swine Flu In Illinois swine flu symptoms and treatments tamiflu adverse events Tamiflu Ordering molen flu shoots cdc + swine flu treatment Tamiflu For Parvo swine flu in ohio tamiflu for bird flu and 2007; Get A Flu Shoot In Nyc tamiflu shelf life tylenol cold and flu severe Acme Philadelphia Flu Shoots Acme tamiflu and effectiveness and safety tamiflu in dogs! Avian Resistance Tamiflu 2008 tamiflu for only 4 days ingridients of tamiflu Tamiflu Lost Voice intestinal flu number needed to treat for tamiflu Tamiflu Adverse Reaction "medwatch form for tamiflu" wiki tamiflu Tamiflu In Dogs tamiflu otc tamiflu recalls Feline Panleukopenia Tamiflu tamiflu tamiflu mexico; Pediatric Tamiflu Pyschiatric swine flu in mexico! panleukopenia and tamiflu Swine Flu Outbreak Map rebate on tamiflu, depo provera flu interfere! Tamiflu Drinking Alcohol tamiflu and seizure swine flu conspiracy How To Store Tamiflu aids tamiflu flu; tamiflu nausea Symptoms Of The Flu tamiflu invent prevention of flu Rder Tamiflu For Dogs chilli cold and flu treatment gilead science donald rumsfeld tamiflu Tamiflu And Weight Gain tamiflu and parvo prophylactic tamiflu Cdc Tamiflu tamiflu roche swine flu cartoons How To Give Tamiflu Vaccine tamiflu roche dick cheney? flu prevention signs Mexican Flu Prevention Vancouver who invented tamiflu rogaine flu symptoms Swine Flu In Mexico pravachol nexium actos phentermine tamiflu flu shot and tylenol, Swine Flu Symtoms stock ticker who makes tamiflu does tamiflu work Tamiflu Stockpile Singapore influenza a tamiflu acme philadelphia flu shoots acme Tylenol Cold And Flu Medicine 2009 flu multnomah county oregon rumsfeld's growing stake in tamiflu fort detrick Flu Prevention Pamphlet pediatric tamiflu buy tamiflu; Swine Flu Cover Up swine flu wisconsin? "generic for tamiflu" Tamiflu Expiry Date swine flu masks? tamiflu suspension Spainish Flu tamiflu on line tamiflu stomach flu Facts On The Flu Shot Tylenol flu pregnant tylenol flu severe 718. flu treatments without tylenol! Swine Flu Methotrexate "post-exposure tamiflu dosing" home treatment of the flu Immunity Low After Tamiflu tamiflu alcohol rebate on tamiflu, Tamiflu For Sale tamiflu hemorrhoid tamiflu flu Can You Buy Tamiflu Otc tamiflu dosing instructions Stomach flu and treatments stomach flu asprin tylenol 642. Gastric Flu Treatment acheter tamiflu weaponized swine flu; Tamiflu En Espana flu symptoms prilosec flu shoots companys Tamiflu What Abnormal Behaviour Was Exhibited Swine flu swine flu 1976 147. buy tamiflu without a prescription Flu Vaccine tamiflu antiviral stockpiling; tamiflu suspension no prescription Parvo With Tamiflu tamiflu without a prescribtion flu medication tamiflu Tamiflu 60 Mg swine flu symptoms and treatments tamiflu adverse events Pros And Cons Of Tamiflu molen flu shoots cdc + swine flu treatment Tylenol Cold Flu swine flu in ohio tamiflu for bird flu and 2007; Oseltamivir Tamiflu tamiflu shelf life tylenol cold and flu severe Tamiflu Nyquil tamiflu and effectiveness and safety tamiflu in dogs! Tamiflu Recall tamiflu for only 4 days ingridients of tamiflu Flu Shoot Baltimore Location intestinal flu number needed to treat for tamiflu Roche Tamiflu Government "medwatch form for tamiflu" wiki tamiflu Flu Activity tamiflu otc tamiflu recalls Purchase Tamiflu No Prescription tamiflu tamiflu manufacturer gilliad Where To Buy Tamiflu swine flu mask; panleukopenia and tamiflu Motrin Cold Flu rebate on tamiflu, depo provera flu interfere! What Is Tamiflu tamiflu and seizure swine flu conspiracy Map Of Swine Flu Cases aids tamiflu flu; tamiflu nausea Will Tamiflu Help Reduce Fever tamiflu invent prevention of flu Stop Tamiflu Make Flu Worse chilli cold and flu treatment gilead science donald rumsfeld tamiflu Publics Florida Flu Shoots tamiflu and parvo prophylactic tamiflu Swine Flu In Florida tamiflu roche swine flu death toll Tamiflu Withdrawal tamiflu roche dick cheney? flu prevention signs Tamiflu Stomach Flu who invented tamiflu reactions to tamiflu Tamiflu From Mexico pravachol nexium actos phentermine tamiflu flu shot and tylenol, Is The Swine Flu Bullshit stock ticker who makes tamiflu does tamiflu work Tamiflu Producer influenza a tamiflu aids tamiflu flu; Flu Virus 2009 flu multnomah county oregon rumsfeld's growing stake in tamiflu fort detrick Swine Flu Syptoms pediatric tamiflu buy tamiflu;

Tamiflu Donald Rumsfeld

swine flu wisconsin? flu vaccine! Tamiflu swine flu masks? tamiflu uk shop? Tamiflu Excretion tamiflu on line tamiflu stomach flu Flu Fosamax Tylenol flu pregnant tylenol flu severe 718. flu treatments without tylenol! Obama Tamiflu

"post-exposure tamiflu dosing"

h1n1 flu symptoms Swine Flu In California tamiflu alcohol rebate on tamiflu, Tamiflu Over The Counter

tamiflu hemorrhoid

tamiflu dosing instructions Tamiflu History tamiflu dosing instructions star anise in tamiflu H1n1 Flu acheter tamiflu what are some treatments of swine flu Price Of Tamiflu flu symptoms prilosec flu shoots companys Tamiflu And Extended Shelf Life Program Swine flu swine flu 1976 147. buy tamiflu without a prescription Flagyl Flu Symptoms tamiflu antiviral stockpiling; tamiflu suspension no prescription Tamiflu And Relenza tamiflu without a prescribtion flu masks Cost Of Tamiflu swine flu symptoms and treatments tamiflu adverse events Tamiflu Dosing Instructions molen flu shoots cdc + swine flu treatment Swine Flu North Carolina swine flu in ohio tamiflu for bird flu and 2007; Swine Flu And Steroid Treatment tamiflu shelf life tylenol flu night time Donald Rumsfield Tamiflu tamiflu and effectiveness and safety tamiflu in dogs! Swine Flu Indiana tamiflu for only 4 days ingridients of tamiflu Who Swine Flu intestinal flu number needed to treat for tamiflu Flu Shot And Tylenol

"medwatch form for tamiflu"

"when to take tamiflu" Tamiflu Medical tamiflu otc tamiflu recalls Tamiflu Price tamiflu tamiflu manufacturer gilliad Swine Flu Funny swine flu mask; panleukopenia and tamiflu Flu Shoots Essex County Ny rebate on tamiflu, depo flu provera symptom Cipro Tamiflu Drug Interaction tamiflu and seizure swine flu conspiracy Tamiflu Dosing aids tamiflu flu; tamiflu nausea Stomach Flu

tamiflu invent

pediatric tamiflu

Swine Flu Treatment For Uninsured chilli cold and flu treatment flu vaccine! Side Effects Of Tamiflu tamiflu and parvo prophylactic tamiflu Aids Tamiflu Flu tamiflu roche swine flu death toll How Long Does Swine Flu Last

tamiflu roche dick cheney?

flu injection vs plavix Flu Georgia who invented tamiflu rogaine flu symptoms Donations Of Tamiflu pravachol nexium actos phentermine tamiflu flu shot and tylenol, Tamiflu Yeast Infections stock ticker who makes tamiflu does tamiflu work Tamiflu And Dangers influenza a tamiflu aids tamiflu flu; Pandemic Flu
2009 flu multnomah county oregon remedy for stomach flu Rosuvastatin Flu Treatment pediatric tamiflu buy tamiflu; Tamiflu Mexico swine flu wisconsin? "generic for tamiflu" Incubation Period For Swine Flu swine flu masks? tamiflu uk shop? Prophylactic Tamiflu tamiflu on line tamiflu stomach flu Stomach Flu Treatment Tylenol flu pregnant tylenol flu severe 718. flu treatments without tylenol! Swine Flu Outbreaks "post-exposure tamiflu dosing" home treatment of the flu Gilead Science Donald Rumsfeld Tamiflu tamiflu alcohol rebate on tamiflu, Tamiflu Orders tamiflu hemorrhoid tamiflu flu Flu Shoots tamiflu dosing instructions star anise in tamiflu Spanish Flu acheter tamiflu what are some treatments of swine flu Flu Pandemic flu symptoms prilosec flu shoots companys Drug Interactions With Tamiflu Swine flu swine flu 1976 147. buy tamiflu without a prescription State Purchase Of Tamiflu tamiflu antiviral stockpiling; tamiflu suspension no prescription Medicine Tamiflu tamiflu without a prescribtion flu medication tamiflu Tucson Flu Shoots swine flu symptoms and treatments tamiflu adverse events Tamiflu In North Carolina molen flu shoots cdc + swine flu treatment Tamiflu Experience swine flu in ohio tamiflu for bird flu and 2007; Tamiflu Availabilty tamiflu shelf life tylenol flu night time Prevention Of Swine Flu tamiflu and effectiveness and safety tamiflu in dogs! Can Celexa Cause Flu Like Symptoms tamiflu for only 4 days ingridients of tamiflu Flu Shots intestinal flu no rx tamiflu Swine Flu Pandemic "medwatch form for tamiflu" wiki tamiflu Swine Flu Cancun tamiflu otc tamiflu recalls Tylenol Flu Night Time tamiflu tamiflu manufacturer gilliad Government Buys Tamiflu swine flu mask; panleukopenia and tamiflu Flu Symptoms Headache rebate on tamiflu,

This is a place where open-minded critical thinkers of all political persuasions encounter information and arguments that both support and challenge their preconceptions. The goal is not to eliminate differences but to narrow and clarify them. We begin with a bedrock agreement that the search for insight and clarity is important, serious - and fun.

We ask commenters to be civil and substantive and, if possible, good humored. We reserve the right to delete comments that disregard this request.

Follow The Big Question on Twitter Do you use Twitter? Follow The Big Question.