Guestposter Kevin Diaz: Walz rakes in campaign dollars

July 13th, 2007 – 2:30 PM by D.J. Tice

diaz_1.jpgWASHINGTON — Freshman Rep. Tim Walz, D-Minn., reported Friday that he has raised more than a half-million dollars since last November’s election, when he upset incumbent Republican Gil Gutknecht.timwalz.jpg

Walz, a rising star in the Minnesota DFL, logged a total of $565,295 in contributions as of June 30, the end of the second quarter reporting period. After retiring some campaign debt, he was left with $482,413 in cash on hand.

Walz said he’s “humbled” by the support he’s received since taking office in January. “I truly appreciate the outpouring of support,” he said.

The strong fundraising figures also reflect the importance both parties place on winning the First Congressional District in Minnesota, a swing district that had been in Republican hands since Gutknecht was first elected in 1994.

Since then, Democratic leaders in Congress have made it a priority to protect freshmen who helped them win back control of the House.

Kevin Diaz

9 Responses to "Guestposter Kevin Diaz: Walz rakes in campaign dollars"

Michael Blaine says:

July 13th, 2007 at 3:07 pm

I’m so glad we’re focused on what counts in a democracy — fundraising — and not trivialities like policy and legislative achievements.

Michael Blaine
http://www.rudelystamped.blogspot.com

Michael Blaine says:

July 13th, 2007 at 3:09 pm

Barry Bonds, “Scooter” Libby and the Integrity of American Justice: Relax, It’s Just a Game

“SAN FRANCISCO — AP, 7/12/07. An attorney [Troy Ellerman] who admitted leaking the confidential grand jury testimony of Barry Bonds and other athletes to a reporter was sentenced Thursday to two and a half years in prison, by far the harshest penalty to result from the government’s sprawling probe of steroids in sports.”

If obstruction of justice by I. Lewis “Scooter” Libby in the investigation into the leaking of the name of covert CIA counter-proliferation agent Valerie Plame was deemed not to warrant prison time by President Bush, can there be any doubt that Mr. Ellerman’s sentence will be commuted as well? If the integrity of the nation’s justice system can be eroded when issues of national security are involved, surely it can be obliterated when dealing with something as trivial as a summer game for boys.

Mr. Ellerman should be able to rest easy tonight knowing the president will ensure he never serves a day in the slammer. Clearly, his sentence was “excessive.” After all, thanks to the White House, the nation now understands that honesty in judicial proceedings isn’t really necessary.

Michael Blaine
http://www.rudelystamped.blogspot.com

Cash N. Carey says:

July 13th, 2007 at 8:36 pm

MB – if Plame was covert, where are the charges? If there is no crime, you don’t serve the time. Get over it and take your whining to your anti-Christian site.

Cash N. Carey says:

July 13th, 2007 at 8:39 pm

MB- if there is no crime, you don’t have to serve the time. Plame was not covert. If she was, why weren’t charges leveled against anyone for disclosing her identity? Because it was a political witch hunt. If you are so concerned about justice, Ellerman can buy a pardon like many did from Clinton whenever a dem is president again.

Dora says:

July 13th, 2007 at 9:48 pm

CNC just can’t face the reality that Plame was covert. It was in Fitzgeralds court filing and was widely carried in the media. And yet, CNC keeps repeating the completely, utterly, absolutely discredited right wing crap. Even Bush admitted this week that “someone” leaked her identify. You’re wrong CNC. Get over it.

A political witch hunt, eh? Even though the prosecutor, the judge, and the majority of appellate judges were Republican appointees. What political ax did those Republican appointees have to grind? You just repeat the right wing talking points even though they are baseless jibberish.

Obstruction of justice and perjury are crimes. People are doing time for them. Except of course if you cover up for the president and vice president, then you’ll get a commutation of your sentence.

Michael Blaine says:

July 14th, 2007 at 12:16 am

CnC:

Interesting: how is my blog — Rudely Stamped — “anti-christian”?

I’ve been trying to defend Christian principles around here by pointing out that support for violently pummeling Iraq and being Christian are incompatible. If you want violence inflicted on Iraqis, then you’ll be condemned by God, according to the Bible.

Michael Blaine
http://www.rudelystamped.blogspot.com

Jay says:

July 14th, 2007 at 8:47 am

So far the best post is still the first one.

Michael Blaine says: “I’m so glad we’re focused on what counts in a democracy — fundraising — and not trivialities like policy and legislative achievements.”

Its not often that Michael Blaine and I agree on anything (I believe this makes the second or maybe third instance), so I figured I would enjoy the moment. Spot on assessment. Tragic joke.

The Grace Kelly says:

July 14th, 2007 at 10:56 am

If you hired a roofing contractor because the roofing contractor did an assessment and told you that roof was majorly rotted and needed to be replaced.

Then it turns our the roof is perfectly fine, so the roofing contractor says look your old roof is going, but we can build you a great wonderful new roof.

Then that went wrong and now the contractor tells unless you pay twice the initial estimate, he can’t put up the roof and your roof will rot.

So at some point, I the houseowner figures out that the best thing that I can do as a houseowner is get this contractor as far away from my house as possible, fire the contractor!

This analogy applies to our national politics.

So just substitute Republican for contractor and on WMD for rotting roof, so you have:

If you supported a Republican administration because the Republican administration did an safety assessment and told you that Iraq had to be invaded because of imminent danger of weapons of mass destruction, that needed to be stopped now.

(Now substitute democracy for new roof.)

Then it turns our there are no were no weapons of mass destruction, so the Republican administration said we can build you a great wonderful new democracy in Iraq.

Then that went wrong and now the Republican administration tells unless you pay twice the initial estimate, they can’t guarantee even stability in the region and your security is eroding.

So just like houseowner learn to fire the roof contractor, so must the voter learn to impeach the Republican administration: Cheney and Bush!

Michael Blaine says:

July 14th, 2007 at 8:34 pm

Well, I agree Ms. Kelly. But many American voters are perversely obstinate.

MB

This is a place where open-minded critical thinkers of all political persuasions encounter information and arguments that both support and challenge their preconceptions. The goal is not to eliminate differences but to narrow and clarify them. We begin with a bedrock agreement that the search for insight and clarity is important, serious - and fun.

We ask commenters to be civil and substantive and, if possible, good humored. We reserve the right to delete comments that disregard this request.

Follow The Big Question on Twitter Do you use Twitter? Follow The Big Question.