Conservative v. conservative

May 30th, 2008 – 1:27 PM by Kevin Duchschere

If delegates to the state GOP convention have any question about who to support for delegates and alternates to the national convention in the Twin Cities, all they have to do is look at the huge red banners flanking the convention stage here in Rochester.

The banners proclaim the “Conservative Team,” which includes the likes of Gov. Tim Pawlenty, Sen. Norm Coleman, a handful of legislators and uber blogger Michael Brodkorb.

But the team is being challenged by an alternative slate called the “Conservative Conscience Coalition,” which, according to delegate Tom Conlon represents party members who want the GOP to return to its core principles of liberty, economic freedom and prosperity.

“New people is a healthy thing, and we’re a big-tent party,” said Conlon, a St. Paul school board member who has long flown the Republican banner in the DFL-dominated city.

The coalition slate, Conlon said, is a grassroots effort directed at those who want to “keep conservative values” in the party.

Brodkorb suggested the slate was a front office for Ron Paul supporters, although Conlon said that he’s a McCain supporter (by way of Mike Huckabee).

“I would challenge greatly whether [the Conservative Conscience] slate is more conservative than ours,” said Brodkorb, who was recently profiled in the New York Times for unearthing Al Franken’s workers compensation and tax problems.

And then there’s former Eagan mayor and state auditor Pat Anderson, who is on both slates of delegates. She said her inclusion on the Conservative Conscience slate came after she recently received a mailing at home from the other slate, accusing Paul supporters of dividing the party with their candidates.

“A fragmented vote opens the door for the organized minority to have much more voice and control than their numbers justify,” the letter warns.

That incensed Anderson, who called the chairwoman of Paul’s Minnesota campaign to apologize.

“This is not what our party is about. This should be an open process,” Anderson said. “We need to rebuild our party. We lost the ’06 elections for a reason.”

– Mark Brunswick co-reported this dispatch

One response to "Conservative v. conservative"

Les says:

May 30th, 2008 at 2:17 pm

Jees, they’re getting to be as bad as the defeatocrats..

Third party anyone?

This is a place where open-minded critical thinkers of all political persuasions encounter information and arguments that both support and challenge their preconceptions. The goal is not to eliminate differences but to narrow and clarify them. We begin with a bedrock agreement that the search for insight and clarity is important, serious - and fun.

We ask commenters to be civil and substantive and, if possible, good humored. We reserve the right to delete comments that disregard this request.

Follow The Big Question on Twitter Do you use Twitter? Follow The Big Question.